Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. mYRN
An increasing proportion of the population feels that animals should also be treated with dignity and such species also possess the same rights as human beings. Another section of the population opines that animals exist to meet the various needs of human beings inclusive of food and research. I am of the opinion that animals should also be treated with compassion. The opinion of the growing number of people is that animals should be treated in the same way a human person is treated. Firstly, the principal argument put forth by those in favor of compassionate treatment is that animals are also living beings that experience a plethora of emotions similar to humans. Animals are also prone to feelings. Furthermore, technological developments have led to new methods of exploiting animals. For instance, animals such as cows are either forcefully or artificially impregnated, and their offspring are separated from the mother. Animals have no legal rights. As a result, animals are exploited by big corporations for research remorselessly. Also, poultry animals such as chicken and sheep are injected with artificial substances for gaining the desired quality and then ruthlessly butchered and sold as meat. The proportion of the population against the view argues that animals do not possess the level of intelligence as humans, animals are domesticated and exploited to satisfy human needs. The continued improvement of mankind is a reason utilized for justifying the indiscriminate slaughtering and treatment of animals and an absence of laws are exploited without any guilt. To conclude, animals should be treated with compassion and humans must treat animals with dignity. The absence of legal rights and lack of intelligence is no excuse for meting out inhumane treatment to animals.
An increasing proportion of the population feels that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
also
be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treated
with dignity and such species
also
possess the same rights as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings. Another section of the population opines that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
exist to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
the various needs of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings inclusive of food and research. I am of the opinion that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
also
be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treated
with compassion.

The opinion of the growing number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treated
in the same way
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
person is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treated
.
Firstly
, the principal argument put forth by those in favor of compassionate treatment is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
also
living beings that experience a plethora of emotions similar to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animals
are
also
prone to feelings.

Furthermore
, technological developments have led to new methods of exploiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
For instance
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
such as cows are either
forcefully
or
artificially
impregnated, and their offspring
are separated
from the mother.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animals
have no legal rights.
As a result
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are exploited
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
corporations for research
remorselessly
.
Also
, poultry
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
such as chicken and sheep
are injected
with artificial substances for gaining the desired quality and then
ruthlessly
butchered and sold as meat.

The proportion of the population against the view argues that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
do not possess the level of intelligence as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are domesticated
and exploited to satisfy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
needs. The continued improvement of mankind is a reason utilized for justifying the indiscriminate slaughtering and treatment of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and an absence of laws
are exploited
without any guilt.

To conclude
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treated
with compassion and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
treat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
with dignity. The absence of legal rights and lack of intelligence is no excuse for meting out inhumane treatment to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
284 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.