Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. jyQ1
One of the most debatable issues of recent years is that the way of treating animals by people. A number of people believe that humans should not abuse animals as they have the equal rights like humans. Critics, however, claim that animals must be employed for the sake of necessity of people such as food and research. In this essay, I will address both views and try to reach a conclusion. On the one hand, there is no doubt that animals are also a part of the environment like humans. Though animals are unable to speak, they do wonderful job in a certain sector. Security purpose or helping in crime solution, for instance. It is not uncommon that many house keep a dog for security rather than a guard. At the same time, nowadays dogs have been trained to find criminals which is more effective than a person does. Moreover, animals also represent a country internationally like Royal Bengal tiger of Bangladesh, for example. Therefore, for a society or country's well being, animals should be treated well by people. On the other hand, It is undeniable that humans are strong and intelligent than animals which are important for the society. The world is changing rapidly and for surviving with this changes, animals should sacrifice for the research. For example, research on dental care, a teeth of rat is essential. Besides, meat of chicken or beef or lamb has high protein which is good for health as not all the people in the world are vegetarian. Hence, for a large achievement of human being, animals should be used without hesitation. In conclusion, while, it is argued that there is too much emphasis to place on animals right, my opinion is that animals should be used for human's essentiality. Taking a human's life is a crime whereas taking life of an animal for necessity is not prohibited.
One of the most debatable issues of recent years is that the way of treating
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. A number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
should not abuse
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as they have the equal rights like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
. Critics,
however
, claim that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be employed
for the sake of necessity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
such as food and research. In this essay, I will address both views and try to reach a conclusion.

On the one hand, there is no doubt that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
also
a part of the environment like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
. Though
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are unable to speak, they do wonderful job in a certain sector. Security purpose or helping in crime solution,
for instance
. It is not uncommon that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
a dog for security
rather
than a guard. At the same time, nowadays dogs have
been trained
to find criminals which is more effective than a person does.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
also
represent a country
internationally
like Royal Bengal tiger of Bangladesh,
for example
.
Therefore
, for a society or country's
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
well being
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be treated
well by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

On the other hand
, It is undeniable that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
are strong and intelligent than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
which are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
for the society. The world is changing
rapidly
and for surviving with
Did you mean "these"?
this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should sacrifice for the research.
For example
, research on dental care,
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "a tooth" or simply "teeth"?
a teeth
of rat is essential.
Besides
, meat of chicken or beef or lamb has high protein which is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for health as not all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in the world are vegetarian.
Hence
, for a large achievement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
without hesitation.

In conclusion
, while, it
is argued
that there is too much emphasis to place on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
right, my opinion is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for human's
Possible spelling mistake found.
essentiality
. Taking a human's life is a crime whereas taking life of an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
for necessity is not prohibited.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
315 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.