Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

On the contray, the opposition would not catch thoes moral supporter`s opinions. The defenders for the right of the species out of human seldom choose it is the main purpose for the society abolishing human habits. For the reason keep the habits on controlling other species has been contributing the whole system of people to process the life of animals. Not only above that, the aquirement of animal resources is well-establish during the negelecting the survival right. For those oppositons, animal life is not the main priciple for the progression of human society, even one day the possibility of being genocide by the overuse by the will of human. As a matter of fact, the conclusion for both side would keep continuing change through the time to time. There is no one true answar in any history. The only tactic for solve the quarrl of the right for other species would different from the will of people. Once the progression of the modern society focuse on the life quality of them-selve, the similar moral questions would growing from every where. The living space on the earth is limited, and human would not interfered the single specie needs, that is, human species. Althought vegetarian and religions might be the main population for concerning the right of animals. There has evidence to believe that over breed animal could harm the whole ecosystem on the earth. Due to those reasons, the fight of the right for animals would being digged out in a violence discussions.
On the
Possible spelling mistake found.
contray
, the opposition would not catch
Possible spelling mistake found.
thoes
moral
The character between ‘supporter’ and ‘s’ is an accent character, not a standard apostrophe character. Use “supporter’s” (curly apostrophe) or “supporter’s” (straight apostrophe).
supporter`s
opinions. The defenders for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
of the species out of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
seldom choose it is the main purpose for the society abolishing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
habits. For the reason
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
the habits on controlling other species has been contributing the whole system of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to process the life of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
above that, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
aquirement
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
resources is well-establish during the
Possible spelling mistake found.
negelecting
the survival
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
. For those
Possible spelling mistake found.
oppositons
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
life is not the main
Possible spelling mistake found.
priciple
for the progression of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
society, even one day the possibility of being genocide by the overuse by the will of human.

As a matter of fact, the conclusion for both side would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
continuing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
through the time to time. There is no one true
Possible spelling mistake found.
answar
in any history. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
tactic for solve
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph.
the


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter.
quarrl
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
for other species would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
from the will of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. Once the progression of the modern society
Possible spelling mistake found.
focuse on
the life quality of
Possible spelling mistake found.
them-selve
, the similar moral questions would
The modal verb ‘would’ requires the verb’s base form.
growing
from
Did you mean “everywhere”?
every where
. The living space on the earth
is limited
, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
would not
The modal verb ‘would’ requires the verb’s base form.
interfered
the single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
specie
needs,
that is
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
species.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Althought
vegetarian and religions might be the main population for concerning the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. There has evidence to believe that over breed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
could harm the whole ecosystem on the earth. Due to those reasons, the fight of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
would being
Possible spelling mistake found.
digged
out in
The plural noun “discussions” cannot be used with the article “a”.
a violence discussions
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
252 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.