Humankind is confronted with various environmental problems. It is widely believed that the impacts caused to the environment are so severe that an individual is unable to solve and only governments and enterprises can mitigate the damage. I personally disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, it is apparent that we are dealing with massive environmental issues with elevating scale. For example, water contamination resulting from the manufacturing process of industrial companies has led to vast deaths of marine lives. With such severe damage, it is understandable that a solitary person is incapable of handling. Therefore, the government should be responsible for alleviating these impacts by imposing strict control and punishment on enterprises who violate the environmental protection laws. I opine that these two parties are jointly accountable for solving environmental problems.
On the other hand, each person also plays an essential role in alleviating the environmental damage by applying the rules of reduce, reuse and recycle. For example, everyone should cut down on their daily water usage or utilization of private vehicles during rush hours. These acts can help us avoid clean water scarcity when draughts come or reducing air pollution in the metropolis. I believe that such small and simple acts done by a solitary person can result in positive effects on the environment if they are carried out by a large community. Therefore, it is convincing that ordinary citizens can contribute to resolving environmental problems.
In conclusion, I am against the statement that a single person cannot deal with environmental issues. While it is true that cooperation between government and companies are pivotal to mitigating the impacts, individuals can also devote by taking small but powerful actions. I believe if everyone joins hands to solve these problems, it is possible that our future generations can live in better environmental conditions.
Humankind
is confronted
with various
environmental
problems. It is
widely
believed that the impacts caused to the environment are
so
severe that an individual is unable to solve and
only
governments
and enterprises can mitigate the damage. I
personally
disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, it is apparent that we are dealing with massive
environmental
issues with elevating scale.
For example
, water contamination resulting from the manufacturing process of industrial
companies
has led to vast deaths of marine
lives
. With such severe damage, it is understandable that a solitary
person
is incapable of handling.
Therefore
, the
government
should be responsible for alleviating these impacts by imposing strict control and punishment on enterprises who violate the
environmental
protection laws. I opine that these two parties are
jointly
accountable for solving
environmental
problems.
On the other hand
, each
person
also
plays an essential role in alleviating the
environmental
damage by applying the
rules
of
reduce
, reuse and recycle.
For example
, everyone should
cut
down on their daily water usage or utilization of private vehicles during rush hours. These acts can
help
us avoid clean water scarcity when
draughts
come
or reducing air pollution in the metropolis. I believe that such
small
and simple acts done by a solitary
person
can result in
positive
effects on the environment if they
are carried
out by a large community.
Therefore
, it is convincing that ordinary citizens can contribute to resolving
environmental
problems.
In conclusion
, I am against the statement that a single
person
cannot deal with
environmental
issues. While it is true that cooperation between
government
and
companies
are pivotal to mitigating the impacts, individuals can
also
devote by taking
small
but
powerful actions. I believe if everyone
joins
hands to solve these problems, it is possible that our future generations can
live
in better
environmental
conditions.