Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

123 is important than 456 Do you agree or disagree?

123 is important than 456 Do you agree or disagree? 56aOD

The problem of the city development has recently aroused wide concern among various circles. Some people agree that the enterprise should be placed in the countryside in order to ameliorate the problem in transportation and the residence; others believe that companies and factories are part of the state, thus, these should not be put in the country. Considering both sides of the argument, I totally disagree that enterprises should be placed in suburbs because of … Of all the reasons why companies, factories, and their employees should be located in the downtown, the most important one is that it will create another traffic and housing problem if these are located in the suburbs. The rationale behind is that the distance between employee’s residences and companies is proportional to traffic time. As an example, when the employee commute between countries and the downtown, the traffic time will enhance. As a result, traffic problems are still existing. Conversely, they can spend less time on the transportation when the companies are located vicinity of the downtown. It should also be noted that this method is not solving the problem, it just using suburbs to substitute city. On the grounds that most of the people may reside vicinity of their companies for convenience. For instance, the employee does not want to spend too much time on commuting when they get a little bit tired from work, in which case, they may set their homes in the suburbs. Without using suburbs to substitute cities, employees may do not need to spend too much time on traffic. govern may need to use a better city development plan to solve the problem. Some people may argue that the city scope is limited, thus, moving companies, factories and their employees to the countryside is the only method. This, however, is not true. There are many examples that a good city’s development plan may help to solve this problem. Moreover, the scope of the rural area is also limited, govern can not only rely on these areas. These reasons eliminate the argument of the city’s land size. All in all, it is reasonable to conclude that moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside will generate another traffic problem and cannot solve the traffic and housing problem. I believe that govern design a better city’s development plan is more efficacious to solve these problems. Taking everything into consideration, I disagree that companies, factories and their employees should be moved to countries.

The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 of the city You use this word too often, consider replacing it withevolutionadvancementexpansionimprovementincreaseprogress
development
 has recently aroused wide concern among various circles. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that the enterprise should be placed
 in the countryside in order to ameliorate the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 in transportation and the residence; others believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshopfirmcooperativeindustryworkshopbranch
factories
 are part of the state, thus
, these should not be put
 in the country. Considering both sides of the argument, I totally
 disagree that enterprises should be placed
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenvironshinterlandoutskirtscountrysidevillageoutpost
suburbs
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of …

Of all the reasons why You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshopfirmcooperativeindustryworkshopbranch
factories
, and their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 should be located
 in the downtown, the most This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 one is that it will create another You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 and housing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 if these are located
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenvironshinterlandoutskirtscountrysidevillageoutpost
suburbs
. The rationale behind is that the distance between You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee’s
 residences and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 is proportional to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
. As an example, when the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 commute between countries and the downtown, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 will enhance. As a result
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 are still
 existing. Conversely
, they can spend less You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 on the transportation when the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
are located
 vicinity of the downtown.

It should also
be noted
 that this method is not solving the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
, it This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenvironshinterlandoutskirtscountrysidevillageoutpost
suburbs
 to substitute city. On the grounds that most of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 may reside vicinity of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 for convenience. For instance
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 does not want to spend too much You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 on commuting when they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 a Reduce redundancy by using "little" or "bit".littlebit
little bit
 tired from work, in which case, they may set their homes in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenvironshinterlandoutskirtscountrysidevillageoutpost
suburbs
. Without using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenvironshinterlandoutskirtscountrysidevillageoutpost
suburbs
 to substitute You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 may do not need to spend too much You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 on traffic.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterGovern
govern
 may need to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 a better city You use this word too often, consider replacing it withevolutionadvancementexpansionimprovementincreaseprogress
development
 plan to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 the problem.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 may argue that the city scope is limited
, thus
, moving You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshopfirmcooperativeindustryworkshopbranch
factories
 and their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 to the countryside is the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 method. This, however
, is not true. There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 examples that a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 city’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withevolutionadvancementexpansionimprovementincreaseprogress
development
 plan may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
. Moreover
, the scope of the rural area is also
 limited, govern can not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 rely on these areas. These reasons eliminate the argument of the city’s land size.

All in all, it is reasonable to conclude
 that moving large You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshopfirmcooperativeindustryworkshopbranch
factories
 and their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 to the countryside will generate another You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 and cannot You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 and housing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
. I believe that govern design a better city’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withevolutionadvancementexpansionimprovementincreaseprogress
development
 plan is more efficacious to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. Taking everything into consideration, I disagree that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshopfirmcooperativeindustryworkshopbranch
factories
 and their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :relocated
moved
 to countries. 