Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Write an argument in favour and against of animal testing

Write an argument in favour and against of animal testing gY6md
Nowadays, animal experiments are broadly effectuate in order to aid humanity. Antagonist accuses such acts for being morally wrong, whereas the proponents believe that it is justified if human lives are being saved. in my opinion, life of all creatures should be respected and i support the idea to ban it for non medical procedures e. g cosmetics At first, an alternative should be developed to carry out vital medical research. Unquestionably the practice of animal testings has accelerated tremendously compared to ancient times. According to recent graphs it is estimated that approximately 20. 5milliion animals are used for testing annually. Consequently, exposing some species prone to extinction. Nevertheless, some people claim the fact that it is non ethical to subject animals to go through this trauma. This triggering act apparently cause violence of animal rights and they suffer from excruciating painful process. Furthermore, they aren't lesser creatures due to which they should not go through brutal experiments. This particularly, aroused the movement of anti vivisection organisations to illegalize or reduce no of testings. On contrary, viewing it from broader perspective, it is necessary where new drugs and medical aid are concerned. In fact, animals and human are linked biologically due to which most likely the results are reliable. The researchers usually uses bred animals to witness no repercussion in no of species. moreover, the fabrication of drugs and finding cure for chronic diseases helped greatly in the sustenance of human life In conclusion, the use of living creatures to facilitate bio medical research has received immense amount of judgment but it proves to be significant for this society. Thus, law should be imposed to sufficient amount of animals to be used and put forth to make animal testing more humane
Nowadays,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments are
broadly
Consider using a past participle here: "effectuated".
effectuate
in order to aid humanity. Antagonist accuses such acts for being
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
, whereas the proponents believe that it
is justified
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
are
being saved
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
in
my opinion, life of all creatures should
be respected
and
Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.
i
support the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to ban it for non
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
procedures e. g
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
cosmetics


At
first
, an alternative should
be developed
to carry out vital
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
research.
Unquestionably
the practice of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testings has accelerated
tremendously
compared to ancient times. According to recent graphs it
is estimated
that approximately 20. 5milliion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for testing
annually
.
Consequently
, exposing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
species prone to extinction.

Nevertheless
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
claim the fact that it is
It appears that a hyphen is missing.
non ethical
to subject
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to go through this trauma. This triggering act
apparently
cause violence of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
rights and
they suffer from excruciating painful process.
Furthermore
, they aren't lesser creatures due to which they should not go through brutal experiments. This
particularly
, aroused the movement of anti vivisection
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisations' is British English.
organisations
to illegalize or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
no
of testings.

On contrary, viewing it from broader perspective, it is necessary where new drugs and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
aid
are concerned
. In fact,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
are linked
biologically
due to which most likely the results are reliable. The researchers
usually
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
bred
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to witness no repercussion in
Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
no
of species.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
moreover
, the fabrication of drugs and finding cure for chronic diseases
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helped
greatly
in the sustenance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
life

In conclusion
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of living creatures to facilitate bio
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
research has received immense amount of judgment
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it proves to be significant for this society.
Thus
, law should
be imposed
to sufficient amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
and put forth to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humane
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Write an argument in favour and against of animal testing

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
290 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Write an argument in favour and against of animal testing