Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Vfgujjh xfhki awefyuih dsdfghhhhh xvghjk xaqfhjhh bffhjjjb dfhhjb zdfghh

Vfgujjh xfhki awefyuih dsdfghhhhh xvghjk xaqfhjhh bffhjjjb dfhhjb zdfghh nXdeg
The given bar chart illustrates the information on waste disposal in a European nation between 2005 and 2008. The data has measured in millions tones. Overall, it is clear seen that landfill method was the most used for waste disposal in 2005, while, dumping in sea used a maximum in 2008. Moving to detail, In 2005 landfill method was peak point about 2000 million tones. However, burning an items was slightly down was approximately 900mt. The dumping in sea only 1200 millions tones was the same year. Whilst, the landfill method was dropped in year 2006 about 1600mt. But, the burning method was significantly grown nearly 1100 million tones as well as the dumping the waste material on sea which was 1480mt. Probing further, the dumping in sea method was steady went up nearby 1600 million tones. Whereas, the landfill and burn method was 1200, 900 mt respectively in later year.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
bar chart illustrates the information on waste disposal in a European nation between 2005 and 2008. The data has measured in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tones
.
Overall
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was the most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for waste disposal in 2005, while,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
a maximum in 2008. Moving to detail, In 2005
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was peak point about 2000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tones
.
However
, burning
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "an item" or simply "items"?
an items
was
slightly
down was approximately 900mt. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tones
was the same year. Whilst, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was dropped
in year 2006 about 1600mt.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
, the burning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was
significantly
grown
nearly
1100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tones
as well
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
the waste material on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
which was 1480mt. Probing
further
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was steady went up nearby 1600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tones
. Whereas, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
and burn
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was 1200, 900 mt
respectively
in later year.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Vfgujjh xfhki awefyuih dsdfghhhhh xvghjk xaqfhjhh bffhjjjb dfhhjb zdfghh

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
151 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts