Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

thyuuhjuikjiopl;.[p;'/oikjuhyuthtrfewsdfghjkn gyhhgbv gtyhjm nfrdvgbhn jgd yhtkg gfyuf htr

thyuuhjuikjiopl; . [p; '/oikjuhyuthtrfewsdfghjkn gyhhgbv gtyhjm nfrdvgbhn jgd yhtkg gfyuf htr XlOVg
The layout illustrates the changes done in a cutting tool within 1. 3 million years ago. We can see the front, back, and side views in the diagram of the cutting tool. Overall, In tools from 1. 4 million years ago, there was no sharp edge and, in tools from 800 thousand years ago, sharp edges observed To begin with, a frontal view of the stone from 1. 4 million years ago looked more of an ordinary fatted stone without any proper edges. Looking at the side view of the stone, we can identify a few cracks, which indicate that it was not a planned tool. It shows the underdeveloped brain of the primitive era. On the other hand, we had a cutting tool 800, 000 years ago. Comparing tools from 800, 000 years ago with the ones from 1. 4 million years ago, we could observe that tool has more sharp edges and looks more planned.
The layout illustrates the
changes
done in a cutting
tool
within 1. 3
million
years ago. We can
see
the front, back, and side views in the diagram of the cutting
tool
.
Overall
, In
tools
from 1. 4
million
years ago, there was no sharp
edge
and, in
tools
from 800 thousand years ago, sharp
edges
observed

To
begin
with, a frontal view of the stone from 1. 4
million
years ago looked more of an ordinary
fatted
stone without any proper
edges
. Looking at the side view of the stone, we can identify a few cracks, which indicate that it was not a planned
tool
. It
shows
the underdeveloped brain of the primitive era.

On the other hand
, we had a cutting
tool
800, 000 years ago. Comparing
tools
from 800, 000 years ago with the ones from 1. 4
million
years ago, we could observe that
tool
has more sharp
edges
and looks more planned.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic thyuuhjuikjiopl; . [p; '/oikjuhyuthtrfewsdfghjkn gyhhgbv gtyhjm nfrdvgbhn jgd yhtkg gfyuf htr

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
157 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: