Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

This Diagram has compared four different cities' approximate Carbon dioxide emissions of each person between 1967 and 2007

This Diagram has compared four different cities' approximate Carbon dioxide emissions of each person between 1967 and 2007 mXKXd
This Diagram has compared four different cities' approximate Carbon dioxide emissions of each person between 1967 and 2007. In this essay, I will summarise the graph and try to report the main features. This graph shows average carbon emissions, Where Uk in 1997 each person emitted almost 105metric tonnes Co2. Which was the highest number in this passage compare to other countries. Comparatively nearly 8. 5 Italy 4. 1 and Portugal 1. 1. In 1997 in the UK carbon emission was decreased very slightly, Whereas in Sweden was rose 10. 02 Metric tonnes of carbon. Other two countries, Which were also followed as Sweden. However, Dramatically in UK carbon emissions, each number of people degrading their carbon emissions in 1987 to 2007 Only Sweden had mitigated their carbon emissions 6. 5 in 1997 to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, Uk tried to drop off their carbon emission. Turn to remain data set, Portugal and Italy were the more miniature carbon emission steak holder. In that contemporary, There were boost up their carbon emissions in 1997 to 2007. Portugal was touched nearly five metric tonnes in 1997. At the same time, Italy was pursued 7. 5 metric tonnes of carbon emissions. Besides kept the same as 1997 till in 2007 according to the Diagram. Portugal in 1997 took 5 to slightly increased 0. 5% in 2007, which was so negligible. Overall sum up the Diagram, Developed countries are such as UK and Sweden. In the beginning there each person emitted the maximum amount of Co2. Despite there were aware of CO2 and went down their CO2 emissions. In that Case, In that Italy and Portugal, they were increased their carbon emissions. Due to population and industries development.
This Diagram has compared four
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
cities' approximate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Carbon
dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
of each person between 1967 and 2007. In this essay, I will
Possible spelling mistake. 'summarise' is British English.
summarise
the graph and try to report the main features.

This graph
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
, Where
Possible spelling mistake found.
Uk
in 1997 each person emitted almost 105metric tonnes Co2.
“Which” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Which
was the highest number in this passage compare to other countries.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Comparatively
nearly
8. 5 Italy 4. 1 and Portugal 1. 1. In 1997 in the UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
was decreased
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
slightly
, Whereas in Sweden was rose 10. 02 Metric tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
. Other two countries, Which were
also
followed as Sweden.
However
,
Dramatically
in UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
, each number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
degrading their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
in 1987 to 2007
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Only
Sweden had mitigated their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
6. 5 in 1997 to 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
On the other hand
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Uk
tried to drop off their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
emission.

Turn to remain data set, Portugal and Italy were the more miniature
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
steak holder. In that contemporary, There were boost up their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
in 1997 to 2007. Portugal
was touched
nearly
five metric tonnes in 1997. At the same time, Italy
was pursued
7. 5 metric tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Besides
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
the same as 1997 till in 2007 according to the Diagram. Portugal in 1997 took 5 to
slightly
increased 0. 5% in 2007, which was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
negligible.

Overall
sum up the Diagram,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Developed countries
are such as UK and Sweden. In the beginning there each person emitted the maximum amount of Co2. Despite there were aware of CO2 and went down their CO2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
.
In that Case
, In that Italy and Portugal, they
were increased
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
. Due to population and industries development.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic This Diagram has compared four different cities' approximate Carbon dioxide emissions of each person between 1967 and 2007

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
290 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • This Diagram has compared four different cities' approximate Carbon dioxide emissions of each person between 1967 and 2007