The two charts compare people’s choice of transportation to get to the university between 2004 and 2009.
Overall, we can see clearly that bus and car were the most favorable mean of transport in both two researched years, while train was the least chosen one.
According to the given data, in 2004, the percentage of people preferring to travel by car accounted for slightly more than 50%. The second large trend was bus user, at 33%, which was noticeably much higher than the proportion of cyclist, at about 9%. The percentage of people deciding to go to the university by train and on foot was dramatically small, at 3% and 4% respectively.
The 2009 pie witnessed radical change, which was bus becoming the most chosen transportation with 46%. The proportion of car commuter reduced by almost half, at 28%, while the amount of biker increased by 7%. The percentage of foot passenger and rail user also experienced modest growth, at 6% and 4% of each.
The two charts compare
people
’s choice of transportation to
get
to the university between 2004 and 2009.
Overall
, we can
see
clearly
that bus and car were the most favorable mean of transport in both two researched years, while train was the least chosen one.
According to the
given
data, in 2004, the percentage of
people
preferring to travel by car accounted for
slightly
more than 50%. The second large trend was bus user, at 33%, which was
noticeably
much higher than the proportion of cyclist, at about 9%. The percentage of
people
deciding to go to the university by train and on foot was
dramatically
small
, at 3% and 4%
respectively
.
The
2009 pie witnessed radical
change
, which was bus becoming the most chosen transportation with 46%.
The
proportion of car commuter
reduced
by almost half, at 28%, while the amount of biker increased by 7%.
The
percentage of foot passenger and rail user
also
experienced modest growth, at 6% and 4% of each.