The table compares the proportion use of various sources to create electric power in different nations in the year 2001.
As can be observed, the amount of electricity produced by others type in five countries was highest, while those by hydro and wind saw the reverse over the period shown.
It is striking that Belgium was the only country with a noticeably higher rate of using nuclear for electricity consumption, at 58%, which was twice as high as Germany. In contrast, Italy did not adopt this kind of renewable energy. While coal and lignite was the most uncommon in Sweden (1%), Germany and Britain stood at 50% and 34%, respectively.
In terms of petroleum products and hydro and wind, Italy accounted for the highest percentage with 27% for the former and 20% for the latter. However, the figures of the other four countries were quite similar, ranging from 2% to 7%. Besides, 43% of other kinds of fuel were utilized to create electric energy in Sweden, followed by Italy (42%) and Britain (39%).
The table compares the proportion
use
of various sources to create electric power in
different
nations in the year 2001.
As can
be observed
, the amount of electricity produced by others type in five countries was highest, while those by hydro and wind
saw
the reverse over the period shown.
It is striking that Belgium was the
only
country with a
noticeably
higher rate of using nuclear for electricity consumption, at 58%, which was twice as high as Germany.
In contrast
, Italy did not adopt this kind of renewable energy. While coal and lignite was the most uncommon in Sweden (1%), Germany and Britain stood at 50% and 34%,
respectively
.
In terms of petroleum products and hydro and wind, Italy accounted for the highest percentage with 27% for the former and 20% for the latter.
However
, the figures of the other four countries were quite similar, ranging from 2% to 7%.
Besides
, 43% of other kinds of fuel
were utilized
to create electric energy in Sweden, followed by Italy (42%) and Britain (39%).