Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table illustrates the proportion of students who gave positive feedback for five different aspects of a Chinese university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010.

The table illustrates the proportion of students who gave positive feedback for five different aspects of a Chinese university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. ELlLR
The table illustrates the proportion of students who gave positive feedback for five different aspects of a Chinese university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. Overall, the rate of students giving good ratings for technical quality, print and electronic resources went up over the period given, while that for the range of modules offered declined and building/teaching facilities stabilized. Noticeably, the figures for building/teaching facilities remained stable in three years. To begin with, the figures for print resources accounted for 87% in the first year. After which, it increased dramatically to 95% in 2005 before falling to 91% in 2010. Besides, the percentages of students giving good ratings for technical quality recorded no change in 2000 and 2005 at 63% then rose slightly to 69% in 2010. Similarly, the figures for electronic resources accounted for 45% in 2000 before roughly doubling to 89% in the last year. On the contrary, the rates of students who gave appreciation for the range of modules offered started 33% in 2000 before falling and hit the lowest point of 26% in 2010. Meanwhile, the figures for building/teaching facilities stood at 75% throughout the three years given.
The table illustrates the proportion of
students
who gave
positive
feedback for five
different
aspects of a Chinese university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010.

Overall
, the rate of
students
giving
good
ratings for technical quality, print and electronic resources went up over the period
given
, while that for the range of modules offered declined and building/teaching facilities stabilized.
Noticeably
, the
figures
for building/teaching facilities remained stable in three years.

To
begin
with, the
figures
for print resources accounted for 87% in the
first
year. After which, it increased
dramatically
to 95% in 2005
before
falling to 91% in 2010.
Besides
, the percentages of
students
giving
good
ratings for technical quality recorded no
change
in 2000 and 2005 at 63% then rose
slightly
to 69% in 2010.
Similarly
, the
figures
for electronic resources accounted for 45% in 2000
before
roughly doubling to 89% in the last year.

On the contrary
, the rates of
students
who gave appreciation for the range of modules offered
started
33% in 2000
before
falling and hit the lowest point of 26% in 2010. Meanwhile, the
figures
for building/teaching facilities stood at 75% throughout the three years
given
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table illustrates the proportion of students who gave positive feedback for five different aspects of a Chinese university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
193 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: