the table illustrates the manufacture of milk yearly in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in three years 1990, 2000, and 2010
the table illustrates the manufacture of milk yearly in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in three years 1990, 2000, and 2010 jDnka
the table illustrates the manufacture of milk yearly in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in three years 1990, 2000, and 2010
it is clear that the number of the Netherlands was the highest figure, in contrast, that of Guatemala ranked the least. The quantities of Australia witnessed slight falling meanwhile there was a considerable jumping of Tanzania and Guatemala.
According to the first two figures, the data of the Netherland and Australia which saw steady going down. The Netherlands and Australian figures fail roughly equally. In 1990 the rate of the Netherlands with 11, 262, 000 that dropped gradually by 107, 000 in 2000 meanwhile the number of Australia experienced marginally from 11, 246, 00 to 11, 105, 000 in 2000. Moreover, the quantity of Australia still went down by 1, 940, 000 in 2010 in contrast, that of the Netherlands saw a slow upward trend to 11, 466, 000 in 2010.
In terms of the least figures, the rate of Tanzania and Guatemala witnessed a quick increase. in 1990 the number of Guatemala was the lowest figure with 26, 000 which rose sharply to 84, 000 in 2010 was threefold as high as in 1990. Besides, there was an exponential going up of the quantity of Tanzania from 87, 000 in 1990 to 1, 55, 000 in 2010.
the
table illustrates the manufacture of milk yearly in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in three years 1990, 2000, and 2010
it
is
clear
that the number of the Netherlands was the highest
figure
,
in contrast
, that of Guatemala ranked the least. The quantities of Australia witnessed slight falling meanwhile there was a considerable jumping of Tanzania and Guatemala.
According to the
first
two
figures
, the data of the
Netherland
and Australia which
saw
steady going down. The Netherlands and Australian
figures
fail roughly
equally
. In 1990 the rate of the Netherlands with 11, 262, 000 that dropped
gradually
by 107, 000 in 2000 meanwhile the number of Australia experienced
marginally
from 11, 246, 00 to 11, 105, 000 in 2000.
Moreover
, the quantity of Australia
still
went down by 1, 940, 000 in 2010
in contrast
, that of the Netherlands
saw
a slow upward trend to 11, 466, 000 in 2010.
In terms of the least
figures
, the rate of Tanzania and Guatemala witnessed a quick increase.
in
1990 the number of Guatemala was the lowest
figure
with 26, 000 which rose
sharply
to 84, 000 in 2010 was threefold as high as in 1990.
Besides
, there was an exponential going up of the quantity of Tanzania from 87, 000 in 1990 to 1, 55, 000 in 2010.