The table gives information about how many people visiting Ashdown Museum within 2 years, before and after its refurbishment whilst the pie chart illustrates the percentage of visitors asked about their satisfaction with their trip in the same two periods.
Generally, there was a significant increase in the number of visitors after the refurbishment. Meanwhile, the results of surveys of visitor satisfaction also witnessed considerable improvements related to the visitors’ good feedback.
Particularly, the quantities of people setting foot in the museum rose by 18, 000, from 74, 000 before and 92, 000 after refurbishment. The increase helped the museum take a sanguine view of visitors’ satisfaction with their trip when the proportions of those who felt very satisfied and satisfy after revamp went up greatly. Specifically, the figure for the first rate criteria just accounted for 15% before the renovation, then more than doubled to 35% later while the numbers for the second were 30% and 40%, respectively.
Meanwhile, an inverse trend in the ratio of visitors feeling dissatisfied and very dissatisfied after refurbishment underwent when just 15% and 5% of those who opined that although the previous figures for those were up to 40% and 10%, respectively. Eventually, the number for people having no response stayed static during the surveyed period, with just 5%.
The table gives information about how
many
people
visiting
Ashdown
Museum within 2 years,
before
and after its
refurbishment
whilst the pie chart illustrates the percentage of
visitors
asked about their satisfaction with their trip in the same two periods.
Generally
, there was a significant increase in the number of
visitors
after the
refurbishment
. Meanwhile, the results of surveys of
visitor
satisfaction
also
witnessed considerable improvements related to the
visitors’
good
feedback.
Particularly
, the quantities of
people
setting foot in the museum rose by 18, 000, from 74, 000
before
and 92, 000 after
refurbishment
. The increase
helped
the museum take a sanguine view of
visitors’
satisfaction with their trip when the proportions of those who felt
very
satisfied and satisfy after revamp went up
greatly
.
Specifically
, the figure for the
first rate
criteria
just
accounted for 15%
before
the renovation, then more than doubled to 35% later while the numbers for the second were 30% and 40%,
respectively
.
Meanwhile, an inverse trend in the ratio of
visitors
feeling dissatisfied and
very
dissatisfied after
refurbishment
underwent when
just
15% and 5% of those who opined that although the previous figures for those were up to 40% and 10%,
respectively
.
Eventually
, the number for
people
having no response stayed static during the surveyed period, with
just
5%.