Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table chart shows the percentage of international visitors to eight countries im 2009 amd 2010.

The table chart shows the percentage of international visitors to eight countries im 2009 amd 2010. aA8ym
The ostensible table chart details the information about the proportion of overseas voyagers who visited to eight various nationalities, in the consecutive years of 2009 and 2010. The given data has been calibrated in percentage. Looking from an overall perspective, it can be readiky apparent that except Germany and Hong Kong most of the international tourists preferred to go in remaining regions throughout the years. Having a clear glance, it can be seen that in both periods, similar proportion of visitors were gone to France with 76% that trend was also witnessed by Spain and UK with 55% global sightseers merely in 2009 bevause in 2010 for nations travellers figure was 56% and 57% respectively. Whereas, there was considerable difference in the percentage of worldwide guests to USA and Italy that was 66% and 67% for USA in both years and 44% in 2009 and 45% in 2010 for Italy with 1. 5%and 2. 3% changes orderly. Turningvto the remaining information, the percentile of cospolitan excursionista for Turkey was nearly one third in 2009 and 46% in 2010 with 33% variations. The highest alterations were faced by China with 55% in which visitors number was declined by almost 10% in comparison of Turkey. In contrast, Germany had most of the sigjtseers only in 2010 with 24 %and 109 %changes was witnessed by it. Hong Kong had the least proportion of visitors in both years.
The ostensible table chart
details
the information about the proportion of overseas voyagers who visited to eight various nationalities, in the consecutive years of 2009 and 2010. The
given
data has
been calibrated
in percentage.

Looking from an
overall
perspective, it can be
readiky
apparent that except Germany and Hong Kong most of the international tourists preferred to go in remaining regions throughout the years.

Having a
clear
glance, it can be
seen
that in both periods, similar proportion of visitors
were gone
to France with 76% that trend was
also
witnessed by Spain and UK with 55% global sightseers
merely
in 2009
bevause
in 2010 for nations
travellers
figure was 56% and 57%
respectively
. Whereas, there was considerable difference in the percentage of worldwide guests
to USA
and Italy that was 66% and 67%
for USA
in both years and 44% in 2009 and 45% in 2010 for Italy with 1. 5%and 2. 3%
changes
orderly.

Turningvto
the remaining information, the percentile of
cospolitan
excursionista
for Turkey was
nearly
one third in 2009 and 46% in 2010 with 33% variations. The highest alterations
were faced
by China with 55% in which visitors number
was declined
by almost 10%
in comparison
of Turkey.
In contrast
, Germany had most of the
sigjtseers
only
in 2010 with 24
%and
109 %
changes
was witnessed
by it. Hong Kong had the least proportion of visitors in both years.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table chart shows the percentage of international visitors to eight countries im 2009 amd 2010.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
234 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: