Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University. KPJN
The table shows the portion of students, in percentage, answering positively to different features offered by McGill University in 2005, 2010 and 2015. Firstly, a significant increase in rates of approval is witnessed under “student services” offered by the university. In particular, the percentage of students who were satisfied with overall service increased by 27 percentage points from 2005 to 2010 and 14% from 2010 to 2015. On the other hand, there is a noticeable decrease in rates of approval over the total range of modules that the institution offers. Indeed, 39% of students gave good ratings in 2005. This number decreases to 31% in 2010 and 25% in 2015. Furthermore, this entry sees the lowest percentages in each one of the three years considered. Last, but not least, McGill appears to provide students with decent library resources, given the high approval percentages which are always above 85% and 88% and 87% in 2010 and 2015. Overall, McGill offers quality in terms of teaching and library resources, despite the fact that the variability of modules may be restrictive.
The table
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
the portion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
, in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
, answering
positively
to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
features offered by McGill University in 2005, 2010 and 2015.

Firstly
, a significant increase in rates of approval
is witnessed
under
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
“student
services” offered by the university.
In particular
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
who
were satisfied
with
overall
service increased by 27
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
points from 2005 to 2010 and 14% from 2010 to 2015.

On the other hand
, there is a noticeable decrease in rates of approval over the total range of modules that the institution offers.
Indeed
, 39% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
gave
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
ratings in 2005. This number decreases to 31% in 2010 and 25% in 2015.
Furthermore
, this entry
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sees
the lowest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
in each one of the three years considered.

Last,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least, McGill appears to provide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
with decent library resources,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
the high approval
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
which are always above 85% and 88% and 87% in 2010 and 2015.

Overall
, McGill offers quality in terms of teaching and library resources, despite the fact that the variability of modules may be restrictive.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
178 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts