Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The proportion of different types of family living in poverty in 1999

The proportion of different types of family living in poverty in 1999 XKPw
The table elucidates some statistics relating to the percentage of various family types who were living below the famine line in 1999. As it can be seen, families with children and people living alone had higher rates of poverty, while the elderly and couples without children were less likely to be living in starvation. Looking at the details, in 1999, the group with the highest proportion of poverty was that of single-parents families, which had a poverty level of 21% and with 242. 000 number of people from each family type living in poverty. Single people with no children also had high levels of poverty at 19% higher than couples who do not have kids which only at 12% proportion and 944. 000 number of people. On the other hand, only 4% of elderly couples were living in poverty lower than the aged singles which have a higher percentage at 6%. Finally, couples with no children were only about half as likely to be living in poverty as couples who did have children.
The table elucidates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
statistics relating to the percentage of various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
types who were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
below the famine line in 1999.

As it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
alone had higher rates of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
, while the elderly and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
were less likely to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in starvation.

Looking at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, in 1999, the group with the highest proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
was that of single-parents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
, which had a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
level of 21% and with 242. 000 number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
from each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
type
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
. Single
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
with no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
also
had high levels of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
at 19% higher than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
who do not have kids which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
at 12% proportion and 944. 000 number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

On the other hand
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
4% of elderly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
lower than the aged singles which have a higher percentage at 6%.
Finally
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
with no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
about half as likely to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
who did have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The proportion of different types of family living in poverty in 1999

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
173 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The proportion of different types of family living in poverty in 1999