The present line graph expresses the produced disposals in tonnes from the three firms between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, whilst company A gradually enlarges throughout the years, ultimately, the other two companies relatively declined in 2015 compared to 2000.
Concerning company A, in 2000 there were approximately 4 tonnes of litter. Although between 2005 and 2010 the rate of growth slightly reduced, the amount boosted significantly. The initial started below other companies, but it overturned after 2010 to be the most.
On the other hand, in 2000 the disposals weighed respectively around 8 tonnes and 12 tonnes regarding company B and C. For the former, it fell steadily below 9 tonnes in 2015. For the latter, despite the escalation maximizing at 2005 as approximately 10 tonnes, the waste shrank considerably in 2015. As a result, company C ended up with the most trivial amount of 3 tonnes among the three firms.
The line graph demonstrated the different trends of waste. The situation reversed in the perspective that company C started as the most moderate, but as other companies diminished its proportions, eventually, it exceeded the others.
The present line graph expresses the produced disposals in tonnes from the three firms between 2000 and 2015.
Overall
, whilst
company
A
gradually
enlarges throughout the years,
ultimately
, the
other
two
companies
relatively
declined in 2015 compared to 2000.
Concerning
company
A, in 2000 there were approximately 4 tonnes of litter. Although between 2005 and 2010 the rate of growth
slightly
reduced
, the amount boosted
significantly
. The initial
started
below
other
companies
,
but
it overturned after 2010 to be the most.
On the
other
hand, in 2000 the disposals weighed
respectively
around 8 tonnes and 12 tonnes regarding
company
B and C. For the former, it fell
steadily
below 9 tonnes in 2015. For the latter, despite the escalation maximizing at 2005 as approximately 10 tonnes, the waste shrank
considerably
in 2015.
As a result
,
company
C ended up with the most trivial amount of 3 tonnes among the three firms.
The line graph demonstrated the
different
trends of waste. The situation reversed in the perspective that
company
C
started
as the most moderate,
but
as
other
companies
diminished its proportions,
eventually
, it exceeded the others.