Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts illustrate the household expenses made by two different Asian countries namely Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010. Overall, it can be seen that, both the nations spent very less amount in the health care sector meanwhile, the both countries gave almost equal priority in term of food and others goods and services sectors. As regard of Japan, it accounted 29% of investment in other goods and services whereas, Malaysia spent merely above a quarter on it. As regard of housing, Japan spent roughly above a fifth at the same time, Malaysia expenditure was just above one third in 2010. Additionally, Japan spent 20% and 6% in the sectors of transportation and healthcare which are twofold investment as compare to Malaysia. Conversely, Malaysia spent 27% in food, which is 3% more than compare to Japan.

The pie charts illustrate the household expenses made by two different Asian countries namely Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010. Overall, it can be seen that, both the nations spent very less amount in the health care sector meanwhile, the both countries gave almost equal priority in term of food and others goods and services sectors. As regard of Japan, it accounted 29% of investment in other goods and services whereas, Malaysia spent merely above a quarter on it. As regard of housing, Japan spent roughly above a fifth at the same time, Malaysia expenditure was just above one third in 2010. Additionally, Japan spent 20% and 6% in the sectors of transportation and healthcare which are twofold investment as compare to Malaysia. Conversely, Malaysia spent 27% in food, which is 3% more than compare to Japan. r09N
The pie charts illustrate the household expenses made by two different Asian countries namely Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010. Overall, it can be seen that, both the nations spent very less amount in the health care sector meanwhile, the both countries gave almost equal priority in term of food and others goods and services sectors. As regard of Japan, it accounted 29% of investment in other goods and services whereas, Malaysia spent merely above a quarter on it. As regard of housing, Japan spent roughly above a fifth at the same time, Malaysia expenditure was just above one third in 2010. Additionally, Japan spent 20% and 6% in the sectors of transportation and healthcare which are twofold investment as compare to Malaysia. Conversely, Malaysia spent 27% in food, which is 3% more than compare to Japan.
The pie charts illustrate the household expenses made by two
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
Asian countries
namely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Japan
and Malaysia in the year of 2010.
Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that, both the nations
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
less amount in the health care sector meanwhile, the both countries gave almost equal priority in term of food
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
and services sectors.

As regard of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Japan
, it accounted 29% of investment in other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
and services whereas, Malaysia
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
merely
above a quarter on it. As regard of housing,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Japan
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
roughly above a fifth at the same time, Malaysia expenditure was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
above one third in 2010.
Additionally
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Japan
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
20% and 6% in the sectors of transportation and healthcare which are twofold investment as compare to Malaysia.
Conversely
, Malaysia
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
27% in food, which is 3% more than compare to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Japan
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts illustrate the household expenses made by two different Asian countries namely Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010. Overall, it can be seen that, both the nations spent very less amount in the health care sector meanwhile, the both countries gave almost equal priority in term of food and others goods and services sectors. As regard of Japan, it accounted 29% of investment in other goods and services whereas, Malaysia spent merely above a quarter on it. As regard of housing, Japan spent roughly above a fifth at the same time, Malaysia expenditure was just above one third in 2010. Additionally, Japan spent 20% and 6% in the sectors of transportation and healthcare which are twofold investment as compare to Malaysia. Conversely, Malaysia spent 27% in food, which is 3% more than compare to Japan.

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
139 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts