Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 98x3
The pie chart describes how many units of electricity are produced by non-renewable sources in Australia and France between the years 1980 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the total production of units increased in both countries. While coal accounted for the highest source of electricity in Australia; Nuclear power was the major source in France. In Australia, during 1980 half of the electricity was produced by coal which saw an exponential increase by three times to reach 130 in 2000. in addition, Hydropower saw a similar pattern where it increased by 16 to produce 36 units in 2000. In contrast, oil and natural gas combined accounted for 30 units in 1980 of electricity which decreased to 4 units in 2000. Whereas in France, nuclear power was the major source for electricity which increased by five times in 2000 to produce 125 units. Coal remained the same during both period by 25 units whereas, hydropower and natural gas was the least contributor by 2 units respectively. Oil provided 5 units of electricity which climbed to 25 units in 2000.
The pie chart
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
describes
how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
are produced
by non-renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
in Australia and France between the years 1980 to 2000.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the total production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
increased in both countries. While coal accounted for the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
in Australia; Nuclear power was the major
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
in France.

In Australia, during 1980 half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
was produced
by coal which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
an exponential increase by three times to reach 130 in 2000.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
in
addition, Hydropower
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a similar pattern where it increased by 16 to produce 36
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.
In contrast
, oil and natural gas combined accounted for 30
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 1980 of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which decreased to 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.

Whereas in France, nuclear power was the major
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which increased by five times in 2000 to produce 125
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
. Coal remained the same during both period by 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
whereas, hydropower and natural gas was the least contributor by 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
respectively
. Oil provided 5
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which climbed to 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
181 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts