Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years

The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years XGorw
The pie charts given below illustrate some comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. The data is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the greatest change was in the other, whilst the significant decrease was petro. In 1995, the hugest percentage was coal which had 29. 80%. Difference from gas as the second biggest percentage was 29. 63%. Followed by petro, it got 29. 27%, meanwhile nuclear and other had total 13% which were the smallest percentages of all energy production of France. On the other hand by 2005, the most popular energy representing 30. 93% of all production, and it had fallen although it was still a suitable energy, while gas was the second famous energy to produce, this increase at only 30. 31% after ten years. The third most favored was petro, but the production fell significantly to only 19. 55%. In contrast, nuclear production went up slightly to 10. 10%. Initially, production on the other was fairly low however this energy grew dramatically over ten years at 9. 10%.
The pie charts
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
below illustrate
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
comparison of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of France in two years. The data
is measured
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
.
Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the greatest
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
was in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
, whilst the significant decrease was
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
.

In 1995, the hugest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
was coal which had 29. 80%. Difference from gas as the second biggest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
was 29. 63%. Followed by
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
got
29. 27%, meanwhile nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
had total 13% which were the smallest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
of all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of France.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand by 2005, the most popular
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
representing 30. 93% of all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, and it had fallen although it was
still
a suitable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, while gas was the second
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
to produce, this increase at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
30. 31% after ten years. The third most favored was
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
fell
significantly
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
19. 55%.
In contrast
, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
went up
slightly
to 10. 10%.
Initially
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
was
fairly
low
however
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
grew
dramatically
over ten years at 9. 10%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
180 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The Pie Charts Below Show The Comparison of Different Kinds of Energy Production of France in Two Years