Information about household spending in district in 1950 and 2010 respectively is compared by the two pie charts. The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, it can be obviously seen that housing was the leader in the first year, and health care took the last place at the end of the given time.
Turning to details, the most expensive was housing in 1950, with almost a seven in ten. The second most expensive was food, where it costs 11. 2%. Education was twice as expensive as transportation, at 6. 6 and 3. 3 % in turn. The next was most of the cost of the other. The least most expensive was health care, with 2. 2%.
By contrast, after 61 years all values had changed. Housing decreased by three times. Food costs had been changed increased by three times. In third place were costs for other. The value of transport was bigger, than it was in 1950, with 14%. The next most expensive was education, at 6. 3%. The least cost of health care as in 1950, approximately one in twenty.
Information about household spending in district in 1950 and 2010
respectively
is compared
by the two pie charts. The units
are measured
in percentages.
Overall
, it can be
obviously
seen
that housing was the leader in the
first
year, and health care took the last place at the
end
of the
given
time.
Turning to
details
, the most
expensive
was housing in 1950, with almost a seven in ten. The second most
expensive
was food, where it
costs
11. 2%. Education was twice as
expensive
as transportation, at 6. 6 and 3. 3 % in turn. The
next
was most of the
cost
of the other. The least most
expensive
was health care, with 2. 2%.
By contrast, after 61 years all values had
changed
. Housing decreased by three times. Food
costs
had been
changed
increased by three times. In third place were
costs
for other. The value of transport was bigger, than it was in 1950, with 14%. The
next
most
expensive
was education, at 6. 3%. The least
cost
of health care as in 1950, approximately one in twenty.