Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The pie chart illustrates the results of a survey of 100 people about their satisfaction with hotel customer service from 2005 to 2010.

The pie chart illustrates the results of a survey of 100 people about their satisfaction with hotel customer service from 2005 to 2010. aVNoV

The given pie charts illustrate the result of a survey of 100 people about their satisfaction level regarding hotel’s customer service between 2005 and 2010. In general, it can be seen that the number of customer satisfaction increased significantly over a 5-year period, whereas the proportion of those who felt poor and very poor witnessed a decline from 2005 to 2010. To begin with, the value of satisfactory ranked first in the amount of review with 45%, which is much higher than the poor and very poor ones, 21% and 15%, respectively. In contrast, the data of good accounted for a quarter and followed by the excellent, just 5%. After that, in 2010, the figure for good saw ameliorate experience, it had reached 39%, up 25% from 2005. Following a similar trend, the excellent one also rose roughly 30% in 2010. However, other figures decreased considerably. 17% and 12%, respectively, was the proportion of the excellent and the poor, the minimum value belonged to the very poor with only 4%.

The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 pie charts illustrate the result of a survey of 100 This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 about their satisfaction level regarding hotel’s customer service between 2005 and 2010.

In general
, it can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 that the number of customer satisfaction increased significantly
 over a 5-year period, whereas the proportion of those who felt You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
 witnessed a decline from 2005 to 2010.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, the value of satisfactory ranked first
 in the amount of review with 45%, which is much higher than the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
 ones, 21% and 15%, respectively
. In contrast
, the data of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 accounted for a quarter and followed by the excellent, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 5%.

After that, in 2010, the figure for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 ameliorate experience, it had reached 39%, up 25% from 2005. Following a similar trend, the excellent one also
 rose roughly 30% in 2010. However
, other figures decreased considerably
. 17% and 12%, respectively
, was the proportion of the excellent and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
, the minimum value belonged to the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunderprivilegedpoverty-strickenneedymeagerpennilesslow
poor
 with This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 4%. 