The bar chart illustrated the amount of the student’s presence in three main courses between 2001 and 2004.
It is clear that students attended in course C increasing little by little. Meanwhile, course B was subject to overall volatility over four years.
In the first two years, the quantity of students was in course A was likely to decrease from 4, 3 millions to 2, 5 millions. After a slight lull, the number of students in course A tended to increase to 4. 5 millions in two year’s time. Meanwhile, there was a fluctuation in the amount of the attenders in course B and finally stood at nearly 3 millions in 2004.
There was a period of stability in the figure for course C, at 2 millions in 2001 and 2002. After two years, the students were in course C saw increase to the highest point, at 5 millions in 2004.
The bar chart illustrated the amount of the
student’s
presence in three main
courses
between 2001 and 2004.
It is
clear
that
students
attended in
course
C increasing
little
by
little
. Meanwhile,
course
B was subject to
overall
volatility over four years.
In the
first
two years, the quantity of
students
was in
course
A was likely to decrease from 4, 3
millions
to 2, 5
millions
. After a slight lull, the number of
students
in
course
A tended to increase to 4. 5
millions
in two year’s time. Meanwhile, there was a fluctuation in the amount of the attenders in
course
B and
finally
stood at
nearly
3
millions
in 2004.
There was a period of stability in the figure for
course
C, at 2
millions
in 2001 and 2002. After two years, the
students
were in
course
C
saw
increase to the highest point, at 5
millions
in 2004.