Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph shows consumption of 4 types of meat in a Eu country from 1979 to 2004 years

The line graph shows consumption of 4 types of meat in a Eu country from 1979 to 2004 years X72W8
The line graph bellow, illustrates usage of different types of meat, such as beef, lamb, fish and chicken in the European country during the period of 1979-2004 years. overall, it can be clearly seen, that consumption of beef and lamb has considerably downward trend, whereas fish remains more stable with fewer fluctuations and chicken consumption has unconditionally upward trend, showing the rise of its popularity among people. From 1999-to 2004 both of the types of meat experienced rapid decline in consumption, however strict downward trend is not expected. In the period of 1979-1999 beef and lamb consumption shows gradual fluctuation, while beef popularity in these years dropped from almost 250 grams per week per person, to nearly 180 grams per person. Lamb popularity likewise in these years dropped considerably, hitting nearly 80 grams from 150 grams per person per week. Alternatively, weekly dose of chicken consumption in 1979 was 150 grams per person and it had frequent fluctuations but significant growth during the period of 1979-2003, reaching its peak of weakly dose up to 260 grams per person, while it still shows slight decline in usage. On the other hand however, fish remains more or less stable type of meat in the people's weekly ration. In 1979 it was up to 60 grams per week per person, it had very slight decline in consumption, compared to other meat products and consumed with little fluctuations nearly 40 grams per week per person during the period of 1097-2004, additionally in contrast with other meat types, shows very slight upward trend.
The line graph bellow, illustrates usage of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
, such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
, fish and chicken in the European country during the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
of 1979-2004 years.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
overall
, it can be
clearly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
, that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
has
considerably
downward
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trend
, whereas fish remains more stable with fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fluctuations
and chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
has
unconditionally
upward
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trend
, showing the rise of its popularity among
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. From 1999-to 2004 both of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
experienced rapid decline in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
,
however
strict downward
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trend
is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
. In the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
of 1979-1999
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
gradual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fluctuation
, while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
popularity in these years dropped from almost 250
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
, to
nearly
180
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Lamb
popularity
likewise
in these years dropped
considerably
, hitting
nearly
80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
from 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
.
Alternatively
, weekly dose of chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
in 1979 was 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
and it had frequent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fluctuations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
significant growth during the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
of 1979-2003, reaching its peak of
weakly
dose up to 260
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
, while it
still
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
slight decline in usage.
On the other hand
however
, fish remains more or less stable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
type
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's weekly ration. In
The comma is probably missing here: "1979, it".
1979 it
was up to 60
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
, it had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
slight decline in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
, compared to other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
products and consumed with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fluctuations
nearly
40
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
during the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
of 1097-2004,
additionally
in contrast
with other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
slight upward
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trend
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph shows consumption of 4 types of meat in a Eu country from 1979 to 2004 years

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
258 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph shows consumption of 4 types of meat in a Eu country from 1979 to 2004 years