Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the line graph gives information about the amount of oil produced and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006.

the line graph gives information about the amount of oil produced and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006. EwKn3
the line graph gives information about the amount of oil produced and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006. Looking at the graph, it is readily apparent that line consumption and production even rose. It also of note that line of production remain stable between 1986 and 1994. Not only that the line of production was higher than that of prodcution. Opposites, at the end outraced the line of production. According to the graph, the oil production increase slightly and accounted for 3 millons of oil barriers per day from 1982 to 1996. In same period, the oil consumption didn’t have a change and only gain about 2 millions of oil barriers per day. Not only that, the oil produced stay unchanged at 3 millions of oil barriers per day in the period from 1986 to 1994. Opposites the oil consumption had increase constantly and reached 3 millions of oil barriers per day equal to the amount for production. We can see from the line graph that the oil consumption continue grow 1 million of oil barriers per day between 1994 and 1998. Didn’t at 4 million of oil barriers per day, it rocketed significantly from 1998 to 2006 and reach the rop position at approximatly 6 millions of oil barriers per day. Compared with the oil consumption, the oil production only rose around 1 millons of oil barriers per day in the period from 1994 to 2006. the line graph gives information about the amount of oil produced and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006. Looking at the graph, it is readily apparent that line consumption and production even rose. It also of note that line of production remain stable between 1986 and 1994. Not only that the line of production was higher than that of prodcution. Opposites, at the end outraced the line of production. According to the graph, the oil production increase slightly and accounted for 3 millons of oil barriers per day from 1982 to 1996. In same period, the oil consumption didn’t have a change and only gain about 2 millions of oil barriers per day. Not only that, the oil produced stay unchanged at 3 millions of oil barriers per day in the period from 1986 to 1994. Opposites the oil consumption had increase constantly and reached 3 millions of oil barriers per day equal to the amount for production. We can see from the line graph that the oil consumption continue grow 1 million of oil barriers per day between 1994 and 1998. Didn’t at 4 million of oil barriers per day, it rocketed significantly from 1998 to 2006 and reach the rop position at approximatly 6 millions of oil barriers per day. Compared with the oil consumption, the oil production only rose around 1 millons of oil barriers per day in the period from 1994 to 2006.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
gives information about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006.

Looking at the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
, it is
readily
apparent that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
even
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rose
. It
also
of note that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
remain stable between 1986 and 1994. Not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
was higher than that of
Possible spelling mistake found.
prodcution
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Opposites
, at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
outraced the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of production.

According to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
slightly
and accounted for 3
Possible spelling mistake found.
millons
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day from 1982 to 1996. In same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
didn’t have a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
gain about 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day. Not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
that, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
stay unchanged at 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
from 1986 to 1994.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Opposites
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
had
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "increased".
increase
constantly
and reached 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day equal to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
for production.

We can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
Probably a preposition is missing after 'continue'.
continue grow
1
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day between 1994 and 1998. Didn’t at 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day, it rocketed
significantly
from 1998 to 2006 and reach the
Possible spelling mistake found.
rop
position at
Possible spelling mistake found.
approximatly
6
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day. Compared with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rose
around 1
Possible spelling mistake found.
millons
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
from 1994 to 2006.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
gives information about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006.

Looking at the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
, it is
readily
apparent that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
even
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rose
. It
also
of note that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
remain stable between 1986 and 1994. Not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
was higher than that of
Possible spelling mistake found.
prodcution
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Opposites
, at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
outraced the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
of production.

According to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
slightly
and accounted for 3
Possible spelling mistake found.
millons
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day from 1982 to 1996. In same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
didn’t have a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
gain about 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day. Not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
that, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
stay unchanged at 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
from 1986 to 1994.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Opposites
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
had
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "increased".
increase
constantly
and reached 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day equal to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
for production.

We can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
Probably a preposition is missing after 'continue'.
continue grow
1
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day between 1994 and 1998. Didn’t at 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day, it rocketed
significantly
from 1998 to 2006 and reach the
Possible spelling mistake found.
rop
position at
Possible spelling mistake found.
approximatly
6
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day. Compared with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rose
around 1
Possible spelling mistake found.
millons
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
barriers
per day in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
from 1994 to 2006.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic the line graph gives information about the amount of oil produced and consumed in China in the years 1982 and 2006.

Academic
  American English
8 paragraphs
480 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts