Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the percentage of usage on food, leisure, clothing, transport, and energy in a particular European nation from 1960 to 2000.

The line graph compares the percentage of usage on food, leisure, clothing, transport, and energy in a particular European nation from 1960 to 2000. L3dgp
The line graph compares the percentage of usage on food, leisure, clothing, transport, and energy in a particular European nation from 1960 to 2000. Overall, apart from transportation, there were upward trends in the consumption of food, leisure, clothes, and energy during the given period. While food consumption had the highest number, fuel usage had the lowest. As can be shown from the graph, the percentage of people who eat food declined dramatically, from around 35% to just under 15%. In addition, there was a gradual fall in the proportion of people who use leisure time, from nearly two in ten in 1960 to approximately one in ten in 2000. In comparison, the percentage of people who use transportation increased slightly from nearly 10 percent to about 15 percent. According to the graph, the percentage of clothing and fuel consumption witnessed a steady drop. The proportion of people who use fuel fell from about 5% to a tiny fraction. The percentage of clothing consumption declined from about 10% in 1960 to approximately 5% in 2000.
The line graph compares the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of usage on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
, leisure, clothing, transport, and energy in a particular European nation from 1960 to 2000.

Overall
, apart from transportation, there were upward trends in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
, leisure, clothes, and energy during the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period. While
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
had the highest number, fuel usage had the lowest.

As can
be shown
from the graph, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
eat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
declined
dramatically
, from around 35% to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
under 15%.
In addition
, there was a gradual fall in the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
leisure time, from
nearly
two in ten in 1960 to approximately one in ten in 2000.
In comparison
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
transportation increased
slightly
from
nearly
10 percent to about 15 percent.

According to the graph, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of clothing and fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
witnessed a steady drop. The proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
fuel fell from about 5% to a tiny fraction. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of clothing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
declined from about 10% in 1960 to approximately 5% in 2000.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the percentage of usage on food, leisure, clothing, transport, and energy in a particular European nation from 1960 to 2000.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
175 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts