Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the amount of cereal exportation in two diverse countries and an organization over a period of 5 years.

The line graph compares the amount of cereal exportation in two diverse countries and an organization over a period of 5 years. LwWY6
The line graph compares the amount of cereal exportation in two diverse countries and an organization over a period of 5 years. Overall, it is clear that wheat exportation in Canada fluctuated between 1985 and 1990. By contrast, it is interesting to note that the amounts of grain products that were transported from European Community increased, while the figure for Australia decreased over a period of shown. Looking at the line graph in more detail, the amount of wheat exported from Canada stood at about 19 million tonnes, compared to nearly 17 million tonnes for European Community in 1985. While it can be seen that the ratio for Australia was slightly lower, at around 15 million tonnes. Over the following year, Canada as well as European Community showed the similar tendency declined to approximately 16 and 14 tonnes, respectively. On the other hand, the ratio for grain products that was carried from Australia increased only by 1 million tonnes. It could be explained by the fact that the figure for the Canada peaked at 25 million tonnes between 1986 and 1988 where it dropped for a period before increasing to the same level as in the beginning of the period. In contrast with it, the proportion of wheat exportation for EC escalated to 15 between 1986 and 1987 where it stabilized for a period before growing to 22 million tonnes. The level of exportation in Australia fell slightly, reaching about 11 million tonnes before a stability between 1989 and 1990.
The line graph compares the amount of cereal exportation in two diverse countries and an organization over a
period
of 5 years.

Overall
, it is
clear
that wheat exportation in Canada fluctuated between 1985 and 1990. By contrast, it is interesting to note that the amounts of grain products that
were transported
from European Community increased, while the figure for Australia decreased over a
period
of shown.

Looking at the line graph in more detail, the amount of wheat exported from Canada stood at about 19
million
tonnes, compared to
nearly
17
million
tonnes for European Community in 1985. While it can be
seen
that the ratio for Australia was
slightly
lower, at around 15
million
tonnes. Over the following year, Canada
as well
as European Community
showed
the similar tendency declined to approximately 16 and 14 tonnes,
respectively
.
On the other hand
, the ratio for grain products that
was carried
from Australia increased
only
by 1
million
tonnes.

It could be
explained
by the fact that the figure for the Canada peaked at 25
million
tonnes between 1986 and 1988 where it dropped for a
period
before
increasing to the same level as in the beginning of the
period
.
In contrast
with it, the proportion of wheat exportation for EC escalated to 15 between 1986 and 1987 where it stabilized for a
period
before
growing to 22
million
tonnes. The level of exportation in Australia fell
slightly
, reaching about 11
million
tonnes
before
a stability between 1989 and 1990.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the amount of cereal exportation in two diverse countries and an organization over a period of 5 years.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
250 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: