Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000

The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Pd72
The supplied line graph illustrates the information about the density of population size in England and Wales and also the birth and death rate between 1700 and 2000. It can be seen that in initial year, the size of population was accounted for under five millions, it showed a sharp incline after fifty years and registered to 10 millions. Interestingly, a sudden rise was observed in the population size after remained stable at 10 millions in the years 1750 and 1800. Eventually, the size of population reached to 50 millions. Moving ahead, approximately 30 children had taken birth in England and Wales per 1000 people in 1700 and it followed zigzag pattern over the given time period. In 1950, birth rate was noticed as just above 25 per 1000 people. Finally, less than 35 children took birth. While, death rate followed almost same trend as birth rate. In the first year, 30 people were died per 1000 people then it inclined drastically and seen as 37. A gradual drop was noted in the death rate. From 1950 to 2000, it levelled off at 20 per 1000 people. Overall, it is crystal clear that in England and Wales population size and birth experienced an upward trend, while death rate followed downward trend over the rendered time phrase.
The supplied line graph illustrates the information about the density of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
size
in England and Wales and
also
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
and death
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
between 1700 and 2000. It can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that in initial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
size
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
was accounted
for under five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a sharp incline after fifty years and registered to 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
.
Interestingly
, a sudden rise
was observed
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
size
after remained stable at 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
in the years 1750 and 1800.
Eventually
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
size
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
reached to 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
millions
. Moving ahead, approximately 30 children had taken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
in England and Wales per 1000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in 1700 and it followed zigzag pattern over the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
time period. In 1950,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
was noticed
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
above 25 per 1000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Finally
, less than 35 children took
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
. While, death
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
followed almost same trend as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
. In the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, 30
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
died
per 1000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
then it inclined
drastically
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
as 37. A gradual drop
was noted
in the death
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
. From 1950 to 2000, it levelled off at 20 per 1000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
Overall
, it is crystal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that in England and Wales
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
size
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birth
experienced an upward trend, while death
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
followed downward trend over the rendered time phrase.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
216 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000