Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th

The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015. It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes. In th GMWEg
The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015. It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes. In the year 2000, company B started out with roughly 8 tonnes of waste, which doubled that of Company C, along with that was 12 tonnes from Company A. Over the next 5 years, the amount of product went to disuse of both Company B and C showed significant rise, at about 6 tonnes for Company C, and Company B reached its peak at 10. Company A’s waste, however, saw a stable drop to almost 11 tonnes. From 2005 to 2015, Company A’s waste volume was still going down quite stably, at around 8 tonnes in 2015 while Company B experienced a dramatic fall in theirs, which dropped to the lowest amount at only 3 tonnes. Company C’s on the other hand, went the opposite way with a rather gradual increase in the first half of the period and a sharp rise in the other half, reaching its highest at nearly 10 tonnes.
The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.

It’s easy to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that the three above bear
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
to no resemblance in the fluctuation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
produced in tonnes.

In the year 2000,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
out with roughly 8 tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
, which doubled that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C, along with that was 12 tonnes from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A. Over the
next
5 years, the amount of product went to disuse of both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B and C
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
significant rise, at about 6 tonnes for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B reached its peak at 10.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
,
however
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a stable drop to almost 11 tonnes.

From 2005 to 2015,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
volume was
still
going down quite
stably
, at around 8 tonnes in 2015 while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B experienced a dramatic fall in theirs, which dropped to the lowest amount at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
3 tonnes.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C’s
on the other hand
, went the opposite way with a
rather
gradual increase in the
first
half of the period and a sharp rise in the other half, reaching its highest at
nearly
10 tonnes.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015. It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes. In th

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
198 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th