The speaker unreasonably concludes that ways to attract women members to get enrolled in order to increase the profits. Among the several untenable assumptions, the most glaring one pertains to increase in the cardiovascular equipment which would increase their business is entirely unsupported. The evidence is too weak and mostly irrelevant to the issues involved. Unless a number of questions were answered satisfactorily, this cannot be considered as a cogent argument.
Firstly the author states that muscle man gym wants to increase their women member enrollment which is currently twenty percent but he hasn't mentioned out of how much is that twenty percent refers too. There is no clear data or graph which represents the percentage of women members in the gym. He also failed to address about the gym services more eloquently.
Secondly he mentions that to increase women members cardiovascular equipments should be more in the gym but there is not clear data about does women only use that equipment in the gym. Given that women likes to use cardio machines on what basis he concludes the statement did he take any members polls and then bring into such conclusion or it was just his assumption. Pictures of body building women and lowering the prices for women members would really increase in their profits was there any proof that thing like this happened before in any other gym.
Thirdly there was no adequate data to ask to why does he wants to increase women member enrollment does that mean the men enrollment is good enough for their business. Is there a possibility that any other gym in surroundings has huge women enrollment so this decreases their business to gain that this is just a business tactics as he mentions to advertise so that people would get attracted. He also failed to mention the price which that is charged for women what if the charges are really too low and if they completely lower the prices then what is their profit that would have been more clearly stated.
In the conclusion this argument would have been more eloquent if the speaker had given more information about the reason behind to increase the enrollment of women members in the gym. Without ruling out alternative explanations and in the absence of requisite information this argument can't be deemed to be persuasive.
The speaker
unreasonably
concludes that ways to attract
women
members
to
get
enrolled in order to
increase
the profits. Among the several untenable assumptions, the most glaring one pertains to
increase
in the cardiovascular equipment which would
increase
their
business
is
entirely
unsupported. The evidence is too weak and
mostly
irrelevant to the issues involved. Unless a number of questions
were answered
satisfactorily
, this cannot
be considered
as a cogent argument.
Firstly
the author states that muscle
man
gym
wants to
increase
their
women
member
enrollment
which is
currently
twenty percent
but
he hasn't mentioned out of how much is that twenty percent refers too. There is no
clear
data or graph which represents the percentage of
women
members
in the
gym
. He
also
failed to address about the
gym
services more
eloquently
.
Secondly
he mentions that to
increase
women
members
cardiovascular equipments should be more in the
gym
but
there is not
clear
data about does
women
only
use
that equipment in the
gym
.
Given
that
women
likes to
use
cardio machines on what basis he concludes the statement did he take any
members
polls and then bring into such conclusion or it was
just
his assumption. Pictures of body building
women
and lowering the prices for
women
members
would
really
increase
in their profits was there any proof that thing like this happened
before
in any other gym.
Thirdly
there was no adequate data to
ask to
why does he
wants
to
increase
women
member
enrollment
does that mean the
men
enrollment
is
good
enough
for their
business
. Is there a possibility that any other
gym
in surroundings has huge
women
enrollment
so
this decreases their
business
to gain that this is
just
a
business
tactics
as he mentions to advertise
so
that
people
would
get
attracted. He
also
failed to mention the price which that
is charged
for
women
what if the charges are
really
too low and if they completely lower the prices then what is their profit that would have been more
clearly
stated.
In the conclusion this argument would have been more eloquent if the speaker had
given
more information about the reason behind to
increase
the
enrollment
of
women
members
in the
gym
. Without ruling out alternative explanations and in the absence of requisite information this argument can't
be deemed
to be persuasive.