Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The graphs above give information about fast food consumption in a European country

The graphs above give information about fast food consumption in a European country PMePg

The bar chart describes the expenditure per person per week spent on fast foods in UK while the line graph illustrates the trends in consumption of that from 1997 to 1990. As can be seen from the bar chart, expenditure on fast foods is broken down into 3 income groups—high income, average income and low income. In the high income groups, expenditure spent on hamburgers accounts for the biggest amount, reaching at just over 40 pence per person per week; while that spent on fish and chips, and pizza are nearly the same which are 17 pence and 19 pence respectively. However, the amount of money spent on hamburgers in average income category falls, reaching at around 32 pence whereas consumptions for fish and chips increases to 25 and pizza has the lowest amount only occupies 11 pence. In contrast, for the low income groups, none of these three types, however, has consumption beyond 20—hamburgers (14), fish and chips (18), and pizza (8). According to the line chart, the consumption of hamburgers saw a gradually increase from just under 100 to over 500 grams by 1990. Unlike the hamburger trend, consumption of fish and chips in general gradually fell, from 300 to 230 over the same period. In contract, pizza gradually increases gradually from 20 to 170 over the two decades, but consistently remains the least popular option. Therefore, it is clear to see from the two graphs that the popularity of hamburgers increases greatly in general over the period, and seems to be most popular in particular with higher income people.

The bar chart This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :characterizesportrays
describes
 the expenditure per person per week You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
 foods in UK while the line graph illustrates the trends in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of that from 1997 to 1990.

As can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 from the bar chart, expenditure on This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
 foods is broken
 down into 3 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
 groups—high You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
, average You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
 and low You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
. In the high You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
 groups, expenditure You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on hamburgers accounts for the biggest amount, reaching at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 40 pence per person per week; while that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on fish and chips, and pizza are nearly
 the same which are 17 pence and 19 pence respectively
. However
, the amount of money You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on hamburgers in average You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
 category falls, reaching at around 32 pence whereas Possible spelling mistake found.consumption
consumptions
 for fish and chips You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increases
 to 25 and pizza has the lowest amount This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 occupies 11 pence. In contrast
, for the low You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
 groups, none of these three types, however
, has You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 beyond 20—hamburgers (14), fish and chips (18), and pizza (8).

According to the line chart, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of hamburgers This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregularlyincreasinglyconstantlymoderatelygentlydeliberately
gradually
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increase
 from This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 under 100 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 500 grams by 1990. Unlike the hamburger trend, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of fish and chips in general
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregularlyincreasinglyconstantlymoderatelygentlydeliberately
gradually
 fell, from 300 to 230 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 the same period. In contract, pizza You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregularlyincreasinglyconstantlymoderatelygentlydeliberately
gradually
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increases
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregularlyincreasinglyconstantlymoderatelygentlydeliberately
gradually
 from 20 to 170 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 the two decades, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
consistently
 remains the least popular option.

Therefore
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 from the two graphs that the popularity of hamburgers You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increases
greatly
in general
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 the period, and seems to be most popular in particular
 with higher You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagerevenueprofitpaycash
income
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
. 