Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Comparison on fuel in two different countries.

Comparison on fuel in two different countries. 1Vg6G

The line graph shows the percentage of income spent by three different statuses on fuel in the United States and the United Kingdom. Both the countries showed contrasting results. While one had an ascending curve, the other had a descending curve. In UK, the poorest sector tends to spend the least amount on fuel when compared to other statuses ranging from 0. 5% to 2. 5%. The graph showed great surge for middle-income earners taking their maximum expenditure to only 4%. However, the graph stood at par for time-being for rich people and saw a minor decrease, shrinking the value nearly up to 3. 5%. In USA, the poorest section spent more than UK of same section with fluctuating figures starting from 4% to 5. 5% and finally 5%. Since then it went down for middle-class section to 4%. For rich people, it once again went down to the last value of only 3%. The poorest section in USA has spent the most as compared to anyone on the graph and the richest sector of the same has spent the least than anyone else.

The line You use this word too often, consider replacing it withchart
graph
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 the percentage of income You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 by three This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 statuses on fuel in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Both the countries This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 contrasting results. While one had an ascending curve, the other had a descending curve. In UK, the poorest sector tends to spend the least amount on fuel when compared to other statuses ranging from 0. 5% to 2. 5%. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withchart
graph
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 great surge for middle-income earners taking their maximum expenditure to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 4%. However
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withchart
graph
 stood at par for time-being for rich This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a minor decrease, shrinking the value nearly
 up to 3. 5%.

A determiner is probably missing here: "In the USA".In the USA
In USA
, the poorest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcategorysectorzonedistrictarearegion
section
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more than UK of same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcategorysectorzonedistrictarearegion
section
 with fluctuating figures starting from 4% to 5. 5% and finally
 5%. Since The comma is probably missing here: "then, it".then, it
then it
 went down for middle-This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :coursetraining
class
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcategorysectorzonedistrictarearegion
section
 to 4%. For rich This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
, it once again went down to the last value of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 3%.

The poorest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcategorysectorzonedistrictarearegion
section
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".in the USA
in USA
 has You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 the most as compared to anyone on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withchart
graph
 and the richest sector of the same has You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 the least than anyone else. 