The graph above illustrates the percentage of the city population without health insurance from 1981 to 2005. The metropolises shown are Seattle and Boston.
As can be seen from the graph, that both of the cities had the same starting point at around over 20 percent. Soon after, they both increase but going up differently as Seattle is having a steeper rise. Yet, the proportion of Boston for the uninsured falls slightly; nevertheless, starts to increase again at around 1990. Besides, in around 1994, Boston's proportion declines gradually from then to 1994; subsequently, drops significantly. After the initial rise, Seattle witnesses a steady drop until 2005. It is apparent from the graph that the figure for the citizens without insurance in both start off at the same point in 1981. While Boston's ratio of uninsured seems to be a lot lower in 2005 than in 1981, Seattle's ratio is a bit lower in 2005 than in 1981.
The graph above illustrates the percentage of the city population without health insurance from 1981 to 2005. The metropolises shown are Seattle and Boston.
As can be
seen
from the graph, that both of the cities had the same starting point at around over 20 percent.
Soon
after, they both increase
but
going up
differently
as Seattle is having a steeper rise.
Yet
, the proportion of Boston for the uninsured falls
slightly
;
nevertheless
,
starts
to increase again at around 1990.
Besides
, in around 1994, Boston's proportion declines
gradually
from then to 1994;
subsequently
, drops
significantly
. After the initial rise, Seattle witnesses a steady drop until 2005. It is apparent from the graph that the figure for the citizens without insurance in both
start
off at the same point in 1981. While Boston's ratio of uninsured seems to be a lot lower in 2005 than in 1981, Seattle's ratio is a bit lower in 2005 than in 1981.