Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates the distribution of four distinct materials that were reused from 1882 to 2010 in a certain country. Overall, Glass containers saw a decrease in the percentages of the material put into reuse initially. On the other hand, Recycling the material of the aluminium cans and plastics has increased throughout the 28 year’s span from 1982 to 1986 Whereas, Paper and cardboard have experienced fluctuations in the percentages of recycling the materials. Firstly, Recycling rate of glass jars initially has dropped from 50% to 40% and then increased gradually hitting 60 percentage of the recycling rate from 1990 to 2010. However, Paper and cardboard has slightly rose reuse rate of the material from 65% to 70% in the year 1892 and dropped little about 5% leaving same amount of increase and decrease between 1982 to 1986 and the rose to almost 80 percentage in the following year. However, Recycling rate of paper and cardboard decreased rapidly to 70 percentages marking it as almost 10 percentage difference from 1990 to 2010 but still maintained the highest recycling rate then the other two materials. Secondly, Reuse rate in percentage of the aluminium cans have rose tremendously with approximate increase from 2 percentages in the year 1982 to almost 45 percentages in the year 2010. However, the aluminium cans failed to cross the recycling rate of the glass containers, paper and cardboard materials. On the other hand, plastics saw a slow increase from approximate 1% to 9% between 1986 and 2010 still acquired the lowest position in terms of recycling rate then the other three materials throughout the 28 year’s period.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
line graph illustrates the distribution of four distinct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
that
were reused
from 1882 to 2010 in a certain country.
Overall
, Glass containers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a decrease in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
put into reuse
initially
. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Recycling
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
of the
Possible spelling mistake. ‘aluminium’ is British English.
aluminium
cans and plastics has increased throughout the 28
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year’s
span from 1982 to 1986 Whereas, Paper and cardboard have experienced fluctuations in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
the materials.

Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of glass jars
initially
has dropped from 50% to 40% and then increased
gradually
hitting 60
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
from 1990 to 2010.
However
, Paper and cardboard has
slightly
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: “risen”.
rose
reuse
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
from 65% to 70% in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1892 and dropped
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
about 5% leaving same amount of increase and decrease
After “between”, use “and”, not “to”.
between 1982 to 1986
and the rose to almost 80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
in the following
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of paper and cardboard decreased
rapidly
to 70
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
marking it as almost 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
difference from 1990 to 2010
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
still
maintained the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
then the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
two materials.

Secondly
, Reuse
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of the
Possible spelling mistake. ‘aluminium’ is British English.
aluminium
cans have rose
tremendously
with approximate increase from 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1982 to almost 45
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2010.
However
, the
Possible spelling mistake. ‘aluminium’ is British English.
aluminium
cans failed to cross the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of the glass containers, paper and cardboard
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, plastics
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a slow increase from approximate 1% to 9% between 1986 and 2010
still
acquired the lowest position in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
then the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
throughout the 28
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year’s
period.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
272 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.