The graph illustrates the quantity of waste produced by company А, company B and company C between the year of 2000 and 2015.
Overall the most striking feature of the graph is that the waste production of company A has gradually decreased throughout the period on contrast, the waste output of company c has considerably increased during the 15 years.
A glance at the graph, in 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, while company B produced 8 tones and company c produced 4 tonnes of waste respectively. In the next five years, company A observed a reduction of 1 tonn in the waste output, on the other hand company B was at the peak (10 tonnes) and the junk output of company C has been increased to 6 tonnes.
Considering the other factors, the waste production of company A has been plunged to 9 tonnes in 2010 which has even been declined (10 tonnes) in the next five years. While company B and company C were produced 7 tonnes of waste material in 2010. Although, company B observed cut down in amount of waste in 2015 whereas company C faced steap raise in junk material in the next five years.
The graph illustrates the quantity of
waste
produced
by
company
А,
company
B and
company
C between the
year
of 2000 and 2015.
Overall
the most striking feature of the graph is that the
waste
production of
company
A has
gradually
decreased throughout the period on contrast, the
waste
output of
company
c has
considerably
increased during the 15 years.
A glance at the graph, in 2000,
company
A
produced
12 tonnes of
waste
, while
company
B
produced
8 tones and
company
c
produced
4 tonnes of
waste
respectively
. In the
next
five years,
company
A observed a reduction of 1
tonn
in the
waste
output,
on the other hand
company
B was at the peak (10 tonnes) and the junk output of
company
C has
been increased
to 6 tonnes.
Considering the other factors, the
waste
production of
company
A has
been plunged
to 9 tonnes in 2010 which has even
been declined
(10 tonnes) in the
next
five years. While
company
B and
company
C were
produced
7 tonnes of
waste
material in 2010. Although,
company
B observed
cut
down in amount of
waste
in 2015 whereas
company
C faced
steap
raise in junk material in the
next
five years.