Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries. Nbg2
The bar chart compares the percentage of waste disposed using various methods in Netherlands, Italy, Spain and the UK. Overall, most of the waste in UK, Italy and Spain were landfilled, but Netherlands recycled a large proportion of their waste. The proportion of waste landfilled in the UK was significantly higher than that of Italy and Spain. Almost 65% of waste was landfilled in the UK, whereas the proportion of waste discarded using the same method was equal in Italy and Spain at 40%. Landfill was the least favoured method of waste disposal in Netherlands and only around 8% of their waste was landfilled. The percentage of waste burnt in Netherlands was 10%, but in Spain this rate was triple. Around 22% of waste was burnt in Italy as opposed to a mere 4% in the UK. An almost equal proportion of waste was used as chemicals in Italy, Spain and the UK which was around 18%, which showed only a slight difference in Netherlands and was low by around 3%. Most popular method of dealing with waste was recycling in Netherlands and it recycled about 68% of its waste. While 20% of waste was recycled in Italy, it was nearly 14% in the UK and approximately 11% in Spain.
The bar chart compares the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
disposed using various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the Netherlands".
in Netherlands
, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Overall
, most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in UK, Italy and Spain were
Possible spelling mistake found.
landfilled
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
Netherlands recycled a large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of their waste.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
Possible spelling mistake found.
landfilled
in the UK was
significantly
higher than that of Italy and Spain. Almost 65% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
Possible spelling mistake found.
landfilled
in the UK, whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
discarded using the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was equal in Italy and Spain at 40%. Landfill was the least
Possible spelling mistake. 'favoured' is British English.
favoured
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
disposal
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the Netherlands".
in Netherlands
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
8% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
Possible spelling mistake found.
landfilled
. The percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
burnt
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the Netherlands".
in Netherlands
was 10%,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in Spain this rate was triple.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Around
22% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was burnt
in Italy as opposed to a mere 4% in the UK. An almost equal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as chemicals in Italy, Spain and the UK which was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
18%, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
a slight difference
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the Netherlands".
in Netherlands
and was low by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
3%.

Most popular
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of dealing with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was recycling
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the Netherlands".
in Netherlands
and it recycled about 68% of its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
. While 20% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was recycled
in Italy, it was
nearly
14% in the UK and approximately 11% in Spain.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
210 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.