Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.

The line graph illustrates the use of global water by three sectors, namely, agriculture, industrial use and domestic use between 1990 and 2000. The table gives information about the water consumption in two countries with details data in 2000. Overall, there is a positive correlation between two figures. In 2000, the water consumption all over the world became highest, particularly in Brazil. According to the graph, it is clear that water consumption for agriculture is significantly higher than other two sectors. We can see that the use of water for agriculture peaked with 3000km3 in 2000. There were no prominently changes in industrial use and domestic use between 1990 and 1950. Later 1960s, the usage in both sectors went up gradually. Looking at the table in more details, Brazil with a population 176 million, owned 26500 km square irrigated land, each people in Brazil used 359m3 of water. By contrast, a few population of Congo consumed only 8m3 because of owning few land.

The line graph illustrates the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of global You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
 by three sectors, namely
, agriculture, industrial This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 and domestic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 between 1990 and 2000. The table gives information about the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
 consumption in two countries with This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
 data in 2000.

Overall
, there is a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 correlation between two figures. In 2000, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
 consumption all over the world became highest, particularly
 in Brazil.

According to the graph, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
 consumption for agriculture is significantly
 higher than other two sectors. We can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 that the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
 for agriculture peaked with 3000km3 in 2000. There were no prominently
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
changes
 in industrial This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 and domestic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 between 1990 and 1950. Later 1960s, the usage in both sectors went up gradually
.

Looking at the table in more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, Brazil with a population 176 million, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possessed
owned
 26500 km square irrigated land, each This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in Brazil This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 359m3 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdrinkrain
water
. By contrast, a Possible agreement error. The noun population seems to be countable; consider using: “few populations”.few populations
few population
 of Congo consumed This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 8m3 This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of owning few land. 