Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given table illustrates the proportion of land that was occupied by forest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Chile in the years of 1990, 2005 and 2015.

The given table illustrates the proportion of land that was occupied by forest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Chile in the years of 1990, 2005 and 2015. x22xw
The given table illustrates the proportion of land that was occupied by forest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Chile in the years of 1990, 2005 and 2015. Overall, the dominant portion of landscape covered by forest was in Brazil throughout the mentioned time frame. However, the least area was in Australia particularly in 2015. To begin with, the Brazil revealed the 62. 2/ was forest land in 1990. It reflected the slight decrease in 2005 and 2015 that was 57. 2/ and 53. 5/ respectively. However, the NewZealand's forest area was approximately half of the Brazil in every given year. In 1990 that indicated 28. 8/. While, the space inclined by 31. 0/ and 32. 3/ in 2005 and 2015 accordingly. In addition to this, the forest zone of Australia represented nearly identical in both years of 1900 and 2005, 21. 9/ and 21. 3/ respectively. Whereas, in 2005 it reduced its dimension by roughly one percent and reached 20. 0/. Furthermore, In Chile the total size of forest was 20. 4/ in 1990. Its section rose by 21. 5/ in 2005. However, the size further grown to 22. 0 in 2015.
The
given
table illustrates the proportion of land that
was occupied
by
forest
in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Chile in the years of 1990, 2005 and 2015.

Overall
, the dominant portion of landscape covered by
forest
was in Brazil throughout the mentioned time frame.
However
, the least area was in Australia
particularly
in 2015.

To
begin
with, the Brazil revealed the 62. 2/ was
forest
land in 1990. It reflected the slight decrease in 2005 and 2015 that was 57. 2/ and 53. 5/
respectively
.
However
, the
NewZealand
's
forest
area was approximately half of the Brazil in every
given
year. In 1990 that indicated 28. 8/.
While
, the space inclined by 31. 0/ and 32. 3/ in 2005 and 2015
accordingly
.

In addition
to this, the
forest
zone of Australia represented
nearly
identical in both years of 1900 and 2005, 21. 9/ and 21. 3/
respectively
. Whereas, in 2005 it
reduced
its dimension by roughly one percent and reached 20. 0/.

Furthermore
, In Chile the total size of
forest
was 20. 4/ in 1990. Its section rose by 21. 5/ in 2005.
However
, the size
further
grown to 22. 0 in 2015.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given table illustrates the proportion of land that was occupied by forest in Australia, New Zealand, Brazil and Chile in the years of 1990, 2005 and 2015.

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
193 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts