The pattern of recycling of different materials between 1982 and 2010 is depicted in the given line graph.
In general, the rate of recycling went up for all four types of materials, but the pattern of their growth differed significantly.
In 1982, the percentage of paper and cardboard which was recycled was 65%, which was 15% more than the rate of recycled glass containers. After some fluctuations, in 1994, recycling of the former type of materials hit a peak of 80%, which stood 30% more than the latter. From then the trends grew opposite, and by 2010, the rates of recycling of both stood at 70 and 60 respectively. It is also noted that there was a decline in the recycling of both these types of materials in 1990.
The recycling of aluminium cans saw a tremendous growth after it was initiated in 1986. From just under 5% it climbed to 45% by 2010. There occurred a gradual hike of nearly 5% in 2010 from about 3% plastic which was recycled in 1990
The pattern of
recycling
of
different
materials
between 1982 and 2010
is depicted
in the
given
line graph.
In general
, the rate of
recycling
went up for all four types of
materials
,
but
the pattern of their growth differed
significantly
.
In 1982, the percentage of paper and cardboard which
was recycled
was 65%, which was 15% more than the rate of recycled glass containers. After
some
fluctuations, in 1994,
recycling
of the former type of
materials
hit a peak of 80%, which stood 30% more than the latter. From then the trends grew opposite, and by 2010, the rates of
recycling
of both stood at 70 and 60
respectively
. It is
also
noted that there was a decline in the
recycling
of both these types of
materials
in 1990.
The
recycling
of
aluminium
cans
saw
a tremendous growth after it
was initiated
in 1986. From
just
under 5% it climbed to 45% by 2010. There occurred a gradual hike of
nearly
5% in 2010 from about 3% plastic which
was recycled
in 1990