The given graph show that, between the decades of 1930 to 1980, the numbers of imprisonment in five countries varied in indefinite pattern.
The given graph show that, between the decades of 1930 to 1980, the numbers of imprisonment in five countries varied in indefinite pattern. MMbWa
It is clear from the graph, in the first given decade of 1930, the numbers of imprisonment in Great Bretain were least among all at almost 30, 000 only, wheres all other countries had significantly more numbers than that of Bretain. Australia had more than half of the number of Bretain, while New Zealand & United States, being at per, at 100, 00 each were more than triple toped the numbers of imprisonment at 1, 20, 000.
During the nect three decads, the number of imprisorment in the Great Britain showed a study rise and reached at almost 60, 000, while Australia for first two decades come down to almost half of the numbers than that of 1930 then in 1960 reached back to the number of 1930 at 70, 000. Also, New zealand shoe simillar fall & rise to come down at almost 80, 000 in 1960. While United states & canada kept switching their top position in numbers of imprisonment.
In 1970, Great Bretain, Australia & New Zealand surprisingly came to same numbers of imprsonment at around 70, 000 eac, while Canada and United States also, showing a decline, stood close to the other three at 85, 000 & 90, 000 respectively.
In the last given decade that is 1980saw a remarkable variety in the numbers of imprisonment in this countries. Great Bretain, New Zealand & Canada rose only slightly in these numbers, wheres Australia came down to as low as almost 50, 000. United States reached the peak, at almost 1, 40, 000 & stood why ahed all the other given countries, in the number of imprisonment.
From the given data, we can observe that, by 1980, United states out numberd all the other mentioned countries in the figures of imprisonment. Showing the opposite trend, Australia showed the highest decline in the number of imprisonment.
It is
clear
from the graph, in the
first
given
decade of 1930, the
numbers
of
imprisonment
in
Great
Bretain
were least among all at
almost
30, 000
only
,
wheres
all
other
countries
had
significantly
more
numbers
than that of
Bretain
. Australia had more than half of the
number
of
Bretain
, while
New
Zealand &
United
States
, being at per, at 100, 00 each were more than triple
toped
the
numbers
of
imprisonment
at 1, 20, 000.
During the
nect
three
decads
, the
number
of
imprisorment
in the
Great
Britain
showed
a study rise and reached at
almost
60, 000, while Australia for
first
two decades
come
down to
almost
half of the
numbers
than that of 1930 then in 1960 reached back to the
number
of 1930 at 70, 000.
Also
,
New zealand
shoe
simillar
fall & rise to
come
down at
almost
80, 000 in 1960. While
United
states
&
canada
kept
switching their top position in
numbers
of imprisonment.
In 1970,
Great
Bretain
, Australia &
New
Zealand
surprisingly
came to same
numbers
of
imprsonment
at around 70, 000
eac
, while Canada and
United
States
also
, showing a decline, stood close to the
other
three at 85, 000 & 90, 000
respectively
.
In the last
given
decade
that is
1980saw a remarkable variety in the
numbers
of
imprisonment
in
this
countries
.
Great
Bretain
,
New
Zealand & Canada rose
only
slightly
in these
numbers
,
wheres
Australia came down to as low as
almost
50, 000.
United
States
reached the peak, at
almost
1, 40, 000 & stood why
ahed
all the
other
given
countries
, in the
number
of imprisonment.
From the
given
data, we can observe that, by 1980,
United
states
out
numberd
all the
other
mentioned
countries
in the figures of
imprisonment
. Showing the opposite trend, Australia
showed
the highest decline in the
number
of
imprisonment
.