Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container, aluminium cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010.

The given graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container, aluminium cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010. QLK81
The given graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container, aluminium cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard rates were fluctuated over a span of 28 years, whereas glass container rates were decreased initially but later recovered. In contrast, aluminium cans increased steadily from 1982 to 2010. Finally, the proportion rates of plastic were relatively stable over the given years. In 1982, the recycling proportion of paper and cardboard is around 65 percentage before it started to fluctuate over the years and ending at 70 percentage in the year 2010. The recycling rates of glass containers were quite low in 1982 when compared to that of paper and cardboard. In 1982, 50 per cent of the materials were recycled before they began to rise from 1990 to 2006. In contrast, these values were very low at first, but gradually increased over the years contributing nearly 45 per cent. Finally, the recycling proportion of plastic is very low and it is relatively stable over the years contributing less than 10 per cent.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
graph illustrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container,
Possible spelling mistake. 'aluminium' is British English.
aluminium
cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010.

Overall
, paper and cardboard
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were fluctuated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
a span of 28 years, whereas glass container
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were decreased
initially
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
later recovered.
In contrast
,
Possible spelling mistake. 'aluminium' is British English.
aluminium
cans increased
steadily
from 1982 to 2010.
Finally
, the proportion

rates of plastic were
relatively
stable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
years.

In 1982, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
proportion of paper and cardboard is around 65 percentage
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
to fluctuate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years and ending at 70 percentage in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2010. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
of glass containers were quite low in 1982 when compared to that of paper and cardboard. In 1982, 50 per cent of the materials
were recycled
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they began to rise from 1990 to 2006.
In contrast
, these values were
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
low at
first
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
gradually
increased
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years contributing
nearly
45 per cent.
Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
proportion of plastic is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
low and it is
relatively
stable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years contributing less than 10 per cent.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container, aluminium cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
182 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The given graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials (paper, cardboard, glass container, aluminium cans and plastics) in a country from 1982 to 2010.