Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given chart illustrates the average carbon dioxide emissions per person of four different countries in 1967 and 2007.

The given chart illustrates the average carbon dioxide emissions per person of four different countries in 1967 and 2007. lXYAX
The given chart illustrates the average carbon dioxide emissions per person of four different countries in 1967 and 2007. Overall, Carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes of the United Kingdom and Sweden gradually went down during the 40 years period. While metric tonnes percentages of Italy and Portugal went up in chart. Despite steady decrease from 11 to 9 rate, emissions in the UK remained higher than in the other three countries over these 40 years. Sweden's emissions suddenly rose to 10. 5 in 1977 but since that descended roughly 5 metric tonnes in 2007. The rate is one of the smallest emitters of four countries that year. Percentage of average carbon emission steadily climbed in Italy. The first emission in metric tonnes started to 4 ratio from 1967, and finally reached almost 8 ratio from 2007. The smallest average ratio is Portugal. This country's average of emissions showed around 1. 5 metric tonnes in 1967. then the record consistently grew and reached a similar level to sweden's by 2007, at about 5 metric tonnes
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
chart illustrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
carbon dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
per person of four
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
countries in 1967 and 2007.

Overall
, Carbon dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
in metric tonnes of the United Kingdom and Sweden
gradually
went down during the 40 years period. While metric tonnes percentages of Italy and Portugal went up in chart. Despite steady decrease from 11 to 9 rate,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
in the UK remained higher than in the other three countries over these 40 years. Sweden's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
suddenly
rose to 10. 5 in 1977
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
since that descended roughly 5 metric tonnes in 2007. The rate is one of the smallest emitters of four countries that year.

Percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
steadily
climbed in Italy. The
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
in metric tonnes
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
to 4
Possible agreement error. The noun 'ratio' seems to be countable, so consider using: "ratios".
ratio
from 1967, and
finally
reached almost 8
Possible agreement error. The noun 'ratio' seems to be countable, so consider using: "ratios".
ratio
from 2007. The smallest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
ratio is Portugal. This country's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
around 1. 5 metric tonnes in 1967.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
then
the record
consistently
grew and reached a similar level to
Possible spelling mistake found.
sweden
's by 2007, at about 5 metric
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
tonnes
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given chart illustrates the average carbon dioxide emissions per person of four different countries in 1967 and 2007.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
174 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts