Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

182. The charts below compare the number of people per household in 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

182. The charts below compare the number of people per household in 1995 and 2005. GLPee

The number of people per household during 1995 and 2005 is what the pie chart exhibits. The data has been calibrated in percentage. In general, what stands out from the graph is, be it, 1995 and 2005, three people bore the flag by defeating rest of the masses over the tenure given. It is immediate apparent that when it comes to 1995, two people were the clear winner by covering 31%, followed by three people, being the first runner-up at 20%. Six people, however was found to be at least front of the chart with a mere of 6%. Though, the ratio of households were somewhat alike in one person, three people and four people but five people had 8% house-caors. With regard to 2005, the figure for three people and five people saw a rise to 35% and 13% respectively, whereas six people and one person had a fall to 3% and 2% orderly. Although, two person and four person had an equivalent ratio.

The number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 per household during 1995 and 2005 is what the pie chart exhibits. The data has been calibrated
 in percentage. In general
, what stands out from the graph is, be it, 1995 and 2005, three You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 bore the flag by defeating rest of the masses over the tenure This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
. It is immediate apparent that when it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to 1995, two You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 were the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 winner by covering 31%, followed by three You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, being the first
 runner-up at 20%. Six You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, however
was found
 to be at least front of the chart with a mere of 6%. Though, the ratio of households Possible agreement erroris
were
 somewhat alike in one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
, three You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 and four You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 five You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 had 8% Possible spelling mistake found.housecoatshorsecars
house-caors
. With regard to 2005, the figure for three You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 and five You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a rise to 35% and 13% respectively
, whereas six You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 and one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
 had a fall to 3% and 2% orderly. Although, two Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: "people", "persons".peoplepersons
person
 and four Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: "people", "persons".peoplepersons
person
 had an equivalent ratio. 