Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given bar graph presents information about the percentage and age groups of Canadian citizens who donated to charitable funds for the years 2000 and 2015.

The given bar graph presents information about the percentage and age groups of Canadian citizens who donated to charitable funds for the years 2000 and 2015. odob
The given bar graph presents information about the percentage and age groups of Canadian citizens who donated to charitable funds for the years 2000 and 2015. It can be seen a rapid ratio climb of Canadians who were on the right side of fifty and gave money to charitable organizations in 2000. The similar trend can be plainly viewed among donating population under 49 in 2015. However, we can see that the number of benefactors aged 49 and over decreased gradually in 2000. Meanwhile, the percentage of donating male and females started to go down from age 64 in 2015. It is clear from the data that the most generous donors were middle-aged people in 2000, whereas the highest ratio of benefactors shifted to the age group from 50-64 in 2015. In 2000 the most significant percentage of benefactors from 35 to 49 ages was around 40%, that is almost 2 times higher in comparison with the ratio of donating group aged from 18 to 24. In 2015 the highest level of Canadians, who gave money to charity, related to the group of 50-64 ages. This level was approximately 38%, while the lowest ratio of charity spending population around 10% was attributed to the youth from 18 to 24 years old. This demonstrates just about 4 times difference between the maximum and minimum ratios of Canadian benefactors.
The
given
bar graph presents information about the percentage and
age
groups
of Canadian citizens who donated to charitable funds for the years 2000 and 2015.

It can be
seen
a rapid
ratio
climb of Canadians who were on the right side of fifty and gave money to charitable organizations in 2000. The similar trend can be
plainly
viewed among donating population under 49 in 2015.
However
, we can
see
that the number of
benefactors
aged 49 and over decreased
gradually
in 2000. Meanwhile, the percentage of donating male and females
started
to go down from
age
64 in 2015. It is
clear
from the data that the most generous donors were middle-aged
people
in 2000, whereas the highest
ratio
of
benefactors
shifted to the
age
group
from 50-64 in 2015.

In 2000 the most significant percentage of
benefactors
from 35 to 49
ages
was around 40%,
that is
almost 2 times higher
in comparison
with the
ratio
of donating
group
aged from 18 to 24.

In 2015 the highest level of Canadians, who gave money to charity, related to the
group
of 50-64
ages
. This level was approximately 38%, while the lowest
ratio
of charity spending population around 10%
was attributed
to the youth from 18 to 24 years
old
. This demonstrates
just
about 4 times difference between the maximum and minimum
ratios
of Canadian
benefactors
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given bar graph presents information about the percentage and age groups of Canadian citizens who donated to charitable funds for the years 2000 and 2015.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
227 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts