Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of different kinds of power generated between Germany and France during 2009.

The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of different kinds of power generated between Germany and France during 2009. Overall, in Germany, conventional thermal was the only type which recorded by far the highest figure, whereas nuclear power contained the highest figure in France over the period shown. Looking at pie charts in more detail, nearly 59. 6% of total electricity in Germany, was accounted for by conventional thermal. While France showed an opposite pattern in conventional thermal, making up for 10, 3%, over 70% energy obtained from nuclear power, which was nearly 3 times higher compared to Germany (23%). Moreover, remained type called renewables, accounted for 17, 4% in Germany and 13. 7% in France. It could be explained by the fact that biomass and wind contained similar figures, 39, 3%, and 36, 9%. While solar and hydroelectric was slightly lower 17, 7% and 6. 1%. In France, the total power provided by hydroelectric which accounted for 80, 5 was significantly higher than biomass, wind, and solar, 8, 1%, 10. 5%, 0, 9% respectively.
The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of
different
kinds of
power
generated between Germany and France during 2009.

Overall
, in Germany, conventional thermal was the
only
type which recorded by far the highest figure, whereas nuclear
power
contained the highest figure in France over the period shown.

Looking at pie charts in more detail,
nearly
59. 6% of total electricity in Germany,
was accounted
for by conventional thermal. While France
showed
an opposite pattern in conventional thermal, making up for 10, 3%, over 70% energy obtained from nuclear
power
, which was
nearly
3 times higher compared to Germany (23%).
Moreover
, remained type called renewables, accounted for 17, 4% in Germany and 13. 7% in France.

It could be
explained
by the fact that biomass and wind contained similar figures, 39, 3%, and 36, 9%. While solar and hydroelectric was
slightly
lower 17, 7% and 6. 1%. In France, the total
power
provided by hydroelectric which accounted for 80, 5 was
significantly
higher than biomass, wind, and solar, 8, 1%, 10. 5%, 0, 9%
respectively
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of different kinds of power generated between Germany and France during 2009.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
178 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: