The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of different kinds of power generated between Germany and France during 2009.
Overall, in Germany, conventional thermal was the only type which recorded by far the highest figure, whereas nuclear power contained the highest figure in France over the period shown.
Looking at pie charts in more detail, nearly 59. 6% of total electricity in Germany, was accounted for by conventional thermal. While France showed an opposite pattern in conventional thermal, making up for 10, 3%, over 70% energy obtained from nuclear power, which was nearly 3 times higher compared to Germany (23%). Moreover, remained type called renewables, accounted for 17, 4% in Germany and 13. 7% in France.
It could be explained by the fact that biomass and wind contained similar figures, 39, 3%, and 36, 9%. While solar and hydroelectric was slightly lower 17, 7% and 6. 1%. In France, the total power provided by hydroelectric which accounted for 80, 5 was significantly higher than biomass, wind, and solar, 8, 1%, 10. 5%, 0, 9% respectively.
The four pie charts provide an outline of the proportion of
different
kinds of
power
generated between Germany and France during 2009.
Overall
, in Germany, conventional thermal was the
only
type which recorded by far the highest figure, whereas nuclear
power
contained the highest figure in France over the period shown.
Looking at pie charts in more detail,
nearly
59. 6% of total electricity in Germany,
was accounted
for by conventional thermal. While France
showed
an opposite pattern in conventional thermal, making up for 10, 3%, over 70% energy obtained from nuclear
power
, which was
nearly
3 times higher compared to Germany (23%).
Moreover
, remained type called renewables, accounted for 17, 4% in Germany and 13. 7% in France.
It could be
explained
by the fact that biomass and wind contained similar figures, 39, 3%, and 36, 9%. While solar and hydroelectric was
slightly
lower 17, 7% and 6. 1%. In France, the total
power
provided by hydroelectric which accounted for 80, 5 was
significantly
higher than biomass, wind, and solar, 8, 1%, 10. 5%, 0, 9%
respectively
.