Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The diagram gives information about changes in vehicular robbery of one thousand transport in four nation states from 1990 to 1999.

The diagram gives information about changes in vehicular robbery of one thousand transport in four nation states from 1990 to 1999. 3bgMb
The diagram gives information about changes in the vehicular robbery of one thousand transport in four nation-states from 1990 to 1999. Overall, the percentage of car theft in Great Britain is the most dramatic change between 1990 and 1999. The number of stolen vehicles from Sweden and Canada is rose, on the contrary, the opposite is true for the figures for thief transport in France. All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure in 1990. Over the period, burglars per thousand of transport in Great Britain fluctuated over the period. The data of thefts increased minimally from 1990 to 1992 on the contrary later declined steadily in 1993 between 20% and 18%. The vehicular robbery growth was slow in 1994, remaining constant in the next 3 years by 2 %, declining slightly from 1997 to 1999. On the other hand, in Sweden, the number of thieves ' cars rose rapidly from 8% to 14% and there reached the highest point of 14% in 1999. As can be seen from the graphs, the vehicular robbery in France is the same as a stolen vehicle in Great Britain which fluctuated from 1990 to 1999. There was increase gradually from 1990 to 1993, then they decreased by 2% in the next 3 years, and they still unstable. Finally, in Canada, the proportion of thieves vehicles declined sizably in 1990, remaining constant in the next 3 years and there were grown steadily about 2% from 1993 to 1999.
The diagram gives information about
changes
in the vehicular robbery of one thousand transport in four nation-states from 1990 to 1999.

Overall
, the percentage of car theft in Great Britain is the most dramatic
change
between 1990 and 1999. The number of stolen vehicles from Sweden and Canada is rose,
on the contrary
, the opposite is true for the figures for thief transport in France.

All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure in 1990. Over the period, burglars per thousand of transport in Great Britain fluctuated over the period. The data of thefts increased
minimally
from 1990 to 1992
on the contrary
later declined
steadily
in 1993 between 20% and 18%. The vehicular robbery growth was slow in 1994, remaining constant in the
next
3 years by 2 %, declining
slightly
from 1997 to 1999.

On the other hand
, in Sweden, the number of thieves
'
cars rose
rapidly
from 8% to 14% and there reached the highest point of 14% in 1999. As can be
seen
from the graphs, the vehicular robbery in France is the same as a stolen vehicle in Great Britain which fluctuated from 1990 to 1999. There was increase
gradually
from 1990 to 1993, then they decreased by 2% in the
next
3 years, and they
still
unstable.
Finally
, in Canada, the proportion of thieves vehicles declined
sizably
in 1990, remaining constant in the
next
3 years and there
were grown
steadily
about 2% from 1993 to 1999.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The diagram gives information about changes in vehicular robbery of one thousand transport in four nation states from 1990 to 1999.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
247 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts