The diagram depicts images of the advancement of tools used for cutting 1. 4 million and 0. 8 million years ago.
Overall, it is clear that the tools in both periods had narrower lateral views compared to the the other sides. In addition, the sharp edge of both tools had equal measurement.
According to the diagram, tool A which was used 1. 4 million years ago had a broad front and back view. On the other hand, when viewed from the side, this equipment had a narrow edge which depicted the cutting surface. However, in the two stones age eras, the stoned maintained a similar 5cm measurement.
Tool B which was developed 0. 6 million years later had particular modification which included an anterior and posterior view that was widened substantially hence appearing almost twice the former one. In contrary to stone A, on the side section, the object was about half the size of the object used in the earlier stone age. Additionally, the item exhibited a more streamlined and sharper outlook.
The diagram depicts images of the advancement of
tools
used
for cutting 1. 4
million
and 0. 8
million
years ago.
Overall
, it is
clear
that the
tools
in both periods had narrower lateral views compared to
the the
other sides.
In addition
, the sharp edge of both
tools
had equal measurement.
According to the diagram,
tool
A which was
used
1. 4
million
years ago had a broad front and back view.
On the other hand
, when viewed from the side, this equipment had a narrow edge which depicted the cutting surface.
However
, in the two stones age eras, the stoned maintained a similar
5cm
measurement.
Tool B which
was developed
0. 6
million
years later had particular modification which included an anterior and posterior view that
was widened
substantially
hence
appearing almost twice the former one. In contrary to stone A, on the side section, the object was about half the size of the object
used
in the earlier
stone age
.
Additionally
, the item exhibited a more streamlined and sharper outlook.