The given bar charts compare the number of people per square km in 2003, and the proportion change in population between 2003 and 2005 in six nations.
Overall, it is clear that although Australian and Canada had the lowest population in 2003, whereas the climb population in these two countries was the maximum in both given years.
Looking at the details, it can be seen from the first chart that the highest density of population had in Japan accounted for 338 square km, while Australia and Canada had the least number of people per square km in 2003, followed by the Uk, Italy and Sweden had about 243, 199, 20 human beings square km respectively.
Turning to the second chart, from 2003 to 2005, this population increased to 1. 42% and 1. 06% respectively in Australia and Canada, whilst in the Japanese, British and Italian, there was a slow rise in percentage of mankind to 0. 35%, 0. 11%, 0. 25% respectively. Interestingly, the population of Swedish decreased by 0. 1%.
The
given
bar charts compare the number of
people
per square km in 2003, and the proportion
change
in
population
between 2003 and 2005 in six nations.
Overall
, it is
clear
that although Australian and Canada had the lowest
population
in 2003, whereas the climb
population
in these two countries was the maximum in both
given
years.
Looking at the
details
, it can be
seen
from the
first
chart that the highest density of
population
had in Japan accounted for 338 square km, while Australia and Canada had the least number of
people
per square km in 2003, followed by the
Uk
, Italy and Sweden had about 243, 199, 20 human beings square km
respectively
.
Turning to the second chart, from 2003 to 2005, this
population
increased to 1. 42% and 1. 06%
respectively
in Australia and Canada, whilst in the Japanese, British and Italian, there was a slow rise in percentage of mankind to 0. 35%, 0. 11%, 0. 25%
respectively
.
Interestingly
, the
population
of Swedish decreased by 0. 1%.