Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.

The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. PaQX

The bar chart compares the proportion of the market of cinema in Australia and the UK while the line graph indicates the admissions in cinema in Australia and UK from 1976 to 2006. Overall, it is clear that US films are the highest and Australian films are the lowest in the bar chart, and admission in UK cinema was more quantity than Australian ones whilst both of them were increased over the period in the line graph. With regards to chart A, US films are the greatest, and in the UK, it is slightly more than Australia, with around 75% and 65% respectively followed by the UK films where there is a remarkable difference UK with just above 20%, compared to Australia with about 5%. Then, there are Australian and others, Australian films are showing more in the UK with approximately 10% whereas others are accounting for just below 20% in Australia which is higher than the UK. In terms of chart B, UK started at just above 100 million which was higher than Australia, and Australia stood at roughly 25 billion. Afterward, admission in the UK decreased sharply and dipped to just below 60 billion in 1985. Then, it increased sharply until reached at close to 180 billion in 2000. Next, it fell near to 160 billion at the end of the period. By contrast, in Australia it rose steadily over the period started from just below 40 billion, and finished at 80 billion.

The bar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withblueprintgraphsketchtable
chart
 compares the proportion of the market of cinema in Australia and the UK while the line graph indicates the admissions in cinema in Australia and UK from 1976 to 2006.

Overall
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that US films are the highest and Australian films are the lowest in the bar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withblueprintgraphsketchtable
chart
, and admission in UK cinema was more quantity than Australian ones whilst both of them were increased
 over the period in the line graph.

Use "in regard to", "with regard to", or more simply "regarding".In regard toWith regard toRegarding
With regards to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withblueprintgraphsketchtable
chart
 A, US films are the greatest, and in the UK, it is slightly
 more than Australia, with around 75% and 65% respectively
 followed by the UK films where there is a remarkable difference UK with This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 above 20%, compared to Australia with about 5%. Then, there are Australian This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:and many more
and others
, Australian films are showing more in the UK with approximately 10% whereas others are accounting for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 below 20% in Australia which is higher than the UK.

In terms of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withblueprintgraphsketchtable
chart
 B, UK This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiated
started
 at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 above 100 million which was higher than Australia, and Australia stood at roughly 25 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
. Afterward, admission in the UK decreased sharply
 and dipped to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 below 60 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
 in 1985. Then, it increased sharply
 until reached at close to 180 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
 in 2000. Next
, it fell near to 160 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
 at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 of the period. By contrast, in Australia it rose steadily
 over the period This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiated
started
 from This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 below 40 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
, and finished at 80 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlotstons
billion
. 